Economic growth is more important than Ecological protection
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
237 comments Page 17 of 24.
Mojidur Rahman said:
9 years ago
I believe that economic growth and ecological protection both are interrelated. One has impact on other, like the way cutting down of trees and constructing buildings. We should not harm the ecological balance in the name of economic growth. Moreover if a country is economically strong than the mindset of the people will not be towards harming the ecological balance.
(6)
Ashutosh said:
10 years ago
Hello, Ladies and Gentleman, I am Ashutosh.
They are co-related with other.
As we know there is two main pillars to developing countries in terms of service as well as manufacturing. We have to keep the balance between technology and ecological because we are not secure without fresh oxygen.
We can not alive without technology also. It is like Car without petrol.
They are co-related with other.
As we know there is two main pillars to developing countries in terms of service as well as manufacturing. We have to keep the balance between technology and ecological because we are not secure without fresh oxygen.
We can not alive without technology also. It is like Car without petrol.
(20)
Yugal kishor meena said:
9 years ago
In today's era, Economic development is more important because it is a source of all concern like poverty, unemployability, education etc. Side by side we have to create such an environment which does not need any kind of protection by utilising innovative ideas of science and techs like Non-conventional sources of energy and its demand of time also. Thanks.
(11)
Riya said:
8 years ago
I believe ecological protection is the foremost thing which each one of us should considere. Nowadays we are neglecting our environment which will eventually gonna hit us back in future. If our ecology is protected then we may work on our economic growth. But if ecological growth is neglected then it will affect human health hence effecting economic growth.
(35)
Albin Jose said:
10 years ago
Hello,
Both are necessary. Our life depends on the environment in which we live. Without considering it If we go forward we will never be able to achieve growth in both fields. Actually, both must get equal preference but ecological protection must have a bit more because economy is created on the environment prevailing inside the country.
Thank you.
Both are necessary. Our life depends on the environment in which we live. Without considering it If we go forward we will never be able to achieve growth in both fields. Actually, both must get equal preference but ecological protection must have a bit more because economy is created on the environment prevailing inside the country.
Thank you.
(16)
Shub said:
9 years ago
In my opinion, ecological growth must be given prime importance, nature is what from which we draw our resources suppose if we focus on growing economy without thinking about the ecology, it will be temporary what we will do later if our resources get exhausted so we should not run like a rabbit but like a tortoise which you know finally wins the race.
(12)
Prashant said:
9 years ago
Hello friends,
According to me, we have to focus on ecological protection more. India is not a poor country, we are still developing nation because of corruption. It is a major threat to our economy. Once we overcome corruption many problems based on economy will be solved. So we better focus on environmental protection and sustainable development.
According to me, we have to focus on ecological protection more. India is not a poor country, we are still developing nation because of corruption. It is a major threat to our economy. Once we overcome corruption many problems based on economy will be solved. So we better focus on environmental protection and sustainable development.
(6)
Vaishnavi said:
4 weeks ago
In my opinion, I don't think it's an either-or.
But the default should flip: ecological stability first and then growth inside those boundaries.
Right now, growth often treats nature like an unlimited account, which doesn't work long-term.
But with clear limits, innovation can still happen, just not at the expense of the systems that keep us alive.
But the default should flip: ecological stability first and then growth inside those boundaries.
Right now, growth often treats nature like an unlimited account, which doesn't work long-term.
But with clear limits, innovation can still happen, just not at the expense of the systems that keep us alive.
Shubham Arora said:
9 years ago
I would definitely defy this statement as we won't be able to utilize economy if we won't have a better place to live in. Technically, shrinking of ecological growth would lead to shrinking of economic growth as when the environment will be not suitable to live, many people's health would be affected which will ultimately cost them more.
(2)
SIDDHANT GARG said:
9 years ago
We can't forget the ecological protection while economic growth. Because both are important not one is more than other ones.
Both are essential for our country because if health would be good so economic structure automatically grows with fresh young minds.
And health will be good when the ecological situation is good for our country.
Both are essential for our country because if health would be good so economic structure automatically grows with fresh young minds.
And health will be good when the ecological situation is good for our country.
(13)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers