Borderless World: A Myth or Reality?

Every coin has two sides. In this pretext, we have both pros and cons. If we analyse the pros, the first thing that comes to our mind is freedom of movement. Just think, you don't have to wait for passports and visas to work in a country. The world would get equal beneficiaries and amenities. This would mean that the developing and underdeveloped countries will be elevated in terms of health and wealth. People from India can move around the world and seek jobs. Unemployment, a major drawback in economy will reduce. Terrorism will also reduce as the cause of terrorism will not be there. Coming to cons, the human culture is something that is related to ego. When there is disrespect for any culture, people become aggressive. Degradation in human values mean self centric values inculcated in oneself. This will tend to reduce the broadening of ideas and will constrict to only specific areas.

I believe a borderless world is a Utopian world. The shame is that it is also a fantasy, because animalistic greed rules the vast majority of humanity and as long as this greed exists, this Utopian borderless world cannot exist. We would need all humans to be of one mind when it comes to fairness, doing for others, etc. The world will become fair and borderless only after the Middle East turmoil dies a painful death.

Borderless world is nothing but a hypothetical thing only. It is not guaranteed to b all people have same thought always. I may agree with that people will get freedom but what about the country! first thing is that it will not treated as a single because it will lose it limit zone. I can say that all people also would be ready to accept a single culture. If so, then misunderstanding will b more and more in all over the world. So I think it is wrong at all to.

People may be all equal but people do NOT feel equally about everyone. That is natural and right. This theory that we should all have the same flies in the face of the fact that some of us put far more in and contribute far more than others.

I think that a borderless world does not have to be physically removing borders of the different countries or nations. In fact, right now in this very debate we are experiencing what it means to be border-less. All of us, from different countries and religions have come together to talk about this topic. L We already have a "media borderless world". So therefore, achieving a borderless world with the means of the Internet and other social media is already a reality.

If the country is borderless then web all would united and we would have no disputes with each other. I think if the world is borderless then we would have no human race. This topic even reminds me of the Frost's poem MENDING WALLS where he had expressed that this whole world belongs to all. These borders cannot be recognized neither by GOD nor by nature. If this borderless than it would be an ideal world! I totally agree with this topic.

I don't think that the country should remove boundaries in order to give freedom. In my opinion the country should have boundaries so that the privacy of the country can't be leaked, its a human tendency that the human is positive only to a particular time after that his thinking changes. The country his known because of its boundaries and if there are no boundaries how come the country will known. So the world without boundary is just a fantasy.

A border less world would be a totally different world. It would change economics, politics and society as we know it. We as humans have, for centuries, lived within boundaries. To have that thing wiped out would mean massive destabilization of a lot of things. Its always going to remain a pipe dream. Changing world order is not something a group of people can work out. And it would be a governance nightmare, if it ever were to become a reality.

Relaxing borders is definitely possible but that would take a serious amount of goodwill and honesty from world leaders, which is easier said than done. Every country has its agenda and self-centered policies and every country would safeguard its interests first before even thinking about anyone else. A border less world is never going to happen, although the idealists in us will keep dreaming of it.

You guys keep mentioning the European Union as an example of a good "borderless" society. Well, it's absolutely not. The European Union is collapsing before our eyes because the people of the various nations don't want to lose their country's national identity. I think a borderless world, myth or reality, is an awful idea to begin with because people don't want to give up their culture. This is why many European leaders have recently condemned multiculturalism as a failure. A borderless world will never work, and we shouldn't work to make it happen. We should stick to making our own countries better and keep the borders.

No, I do not think it is possible because humans nature is to acquire the things which he see around him and he want possession on them. If we make a border-less world it will create a lot of problems that can not be stopped because if we are still having disputes between different nations then how it is possible to control the whole world by a single power.