Data Interpretation - Table Charts - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Table Charts - Table Chart 8 (Q.No. 2)
Directions to Solve
The following table shows the number of new employees added to different categories of employees in a company and also the number of employees from these categories who left the company every year since the foundation of the Company in 1995.
| Year | ||||||||||
| Managers | Technicians | Operators | Accountants | Peons | ||||||
| New | Left | New | Left | New | Left | New | Left | New | Left | |
| 1995 | 760 | - | 1200 | - | 880 | - | 1160 | - | 820 | - |
| 1996 | 280 | 120 | 272 | 120 | 256 | 104 | 200 | 100 | 184 | 96 |
| 1997 | 179 | 92 | 240 | 128 | 240 | 120 | 224 | 104 | 152 | 88 |
| 1998 | 148 | 88 | 236 | 96 | 208 | 100 | 248 | 96 | 196 | 80 |
| 1999 | 160 | 72 | 256 | 100 | 192 | 112 | 272 | 88 | 224 | 120 |
| 2000 | 193 | 96 | 288 | 112 | 248 | 144 | 260 | 92 | 200 | 104 |
2.
What was the total number of Peons working in the Company in the year 1999?
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Total number of Peons working in the Company in 1999
= (820 + 184 + 152 + 196 + 224) - (96 + 88 + 80 + 120)
= 1192.
Discussion:
18 comments Page 2 of 2.
Abhimanyu Garg said:
10 years ago
In this question you are asking only for 1999 year only then why have you taken all years to solving the problem?
Shailendra said:
10 years ago
The answer is correct because he asked that total no of working persons in the office it means that the new members may be added but some of the old employees may be there. So the answer is correct.
Shivangi said:
1 decade ago
Any shortcut to solve this type of questions. Not to add up lengthy numbers.
Hitesh said:
1 decade ago
The statement of the question is incorrect. It Should be How many peons are working together in all the year together then after given answer is correct.
Mitali Ahuja said:
1 decade ago
The language of the question is incorrect and the solution will.
No of peons working in 1999 = 224 - 120.
= 104.
No of peons working in 1999 = 224 - 120.
= 104.
Kishor dutta said:
1 decade ago
Instead of "in the year" it should be "till the year"... I think. Then the question will be accurate.
(1)
Shiv paliwal said:
1 decade ago
In that question they are asking about the particular year 1999 then why they have included all above tha rest of year.
Pranav said:
1 decade ago
Why the data of the year 1999 is considered. At the start of 1999, the data upto the year 1998 will come into effect.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers