Aptitude - Ratio and Proportion - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Ratio and Proportion - General Questions (Q.No. 7)
7.
Salaries of Ravi and Sumit are in the ratio 2 : 3. If the salary of each is increased by Rs. 4000, the new ratio becomes 40 : 57. What is Sumit's salary?
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Let the original salaries of Ravi and Sumit be Rs. 2x and Rs. 3x respectively.
| Then, | 2x + 4000 | = | 40 |
| 3x + 4000 | 57 |
57(2x + 4000) = 40(3x + 4000)
6x = 68,000
3x = 34,000
Sumit's present salary = (3x + 4000) = Rs.(34000 + 4000) = Rs. 38,000.
Discussion:
83 comments Page 2 of 9.
Varsha said:
3 years ago
How we get 2x+4000/3x+4000 = 47/50?
and why not 2x+4000/3x+4000 = 47x/50x?
and why not 2x+4000/3x+4000 = 47x/50x?
(8)
Elumalai said:
1 decade ago
Hai guys listen here...
the 2:3 ratio of Ravi & Sumith salary
2x:3x =>2x/3x
then
Salary increased by each 4000
2x+4000 ---------(1)
3x+4000----------(2)
let we write 2x+4000/3x+4000 (its become new ratio)
2x+4000/3x/4000=40/57 ratio
now solve this
57(2x+4000)=40(3x+4000)
114x+228000=120x+160000
114x-120x=228000-160000
6x=68000
now divided by 2
=> 3x=34000.
now we have 3x value is 34000
let subsitute equation no(2)
=>3x+4000
=>34000+4000
Ans =38000
ok bye...
the 2:3 ratio of Ravi & Sumith salary
2x:3x =>2x/3x
then
Salary increased by each 4000
2x+4000 ---------(1)
3x+4000----------(2)
let we write 2x+4000/3x+4000 (its become new ratio)
2x+4000/3x/4000=40/57 ratio
now solve this
57(2x+4000)=40(3x+4000)
114x+228000=120x+160000
114x-120x=228000-160000
6x=68000
now divided by 2
=> 3x=34000.
now we have 3x value is 34000
let subsitute equation no(2)
=>3x+4000
=>34000+4000
Ans =38000
ok bye...
(7)
M Deva Reddy said:
3 years ago
How come 6x=68000?
Can you explain in detail?
Can you explain in detail?
(7)
Vishnu said:
11 months ago
Let's denote Ravi's initial salary as 2x and Sumit's as 3x.
After the increase, their salaries become:
* Ravi: 2x + 4000
* Sumit: 3x + 4000
The new ratio is 40:57, so we can set up the following equation:
(2x + 4000)/(3x + 4000) = 40/57.
Cross-multiplying:
57(2x + 4000) = 40(3x + 4000)
Expanding:
114x + 228000 = 120x + 160000.
Simplifying:
6x = 68000.
Solving for x:
x = 11333.33.
Now, Sumit's initial salary was 3x. So, his initial salary is:
3 * 11333.33 = 34000
After the increase of Rs. 4000, Sumit's salary becomes:
34000 + 4000 = 38000
Therefore, Sumit's salary is Rs. 38,000.
After the increase, their salaries become:
* Ravi: 2x + 4000
* Sumit: 3x + 4000
The new ratio is 40:57, so we can set up the following equation:
(2x + 4000)/(3x + 4000) = 40/57.
Cross-multiplying:
57(2x + 4000) = 40(3x + 4000)
Expanding:
114x + 228000 = 120x + 160000.
Simplifying:
6x = 68000.
Solving for x:
x = 11333.33.
Now, Sumit's initial salary was 3x. So, his initial salary is:
3 * 11333.33 = 34000
After the increase of Rs. 4000, Sumit's salary becomes:
34000 + 4000 = 38000
Therefore, Sumit's salary is Rs. 38,000.
(5)
Ramya said:
3 years ago
Then what is the Salary of Ravi?
(5)
Mohamed Rafiudeen said:
6 years ago
2:3 difference is 1.
40:57 difference is 17.
Cross multiply:
{2:3 * 17} 34:51.
{40:57 * 1}40:57.
Then difference of 2 ratios is 6.
6=57*4000,
6=228000,
228000÷6,
38,000.
40:57 difference is 17.
Cross multiply:
{2:3 * 17} 34:51.
{40:57 * 1}40:57.
Then difference of 2 ratios is 6.
6=57*4000,
6=228000,
228000÷6,
38,000.
(4)
Ruchith praharsha said:
7 years ago
The original ratio of their salaries are 2:3 and they are increased by 4000 the new ratio is 40:57.
Let their salaries be 2x ,3x.
2x+4000:3x+4000 = 40 :57,
114x +228000 =120x +160000,
6x =68000,
3x =34000 sumits original salary is 34000,
And after increase his salary =34000 + 4000= 38000.
Let their salaries be 2x ,3x.
2x+4000:3x+4000 = 40 :57,
114x +228000 =120x +160000,
6x =68000,
3x =34000 sumits original salary is 34000,
And after increase his salary =34000 + 4000= 38000.
(2)
Pranshu said:
5 years ago
57 - 40 = 17.
Then after.
57multiple with 4000 = 228000.
And then 40 multiple with = 160000.
Then substrate 228000-160000 = 68000.
Then 2x multiple 3x so 6x.
6x = 68000.
2x into 3x = 68000.
3x = 34000.
And then 3x+ 4000.
So 34000 + 4000 = 38000.
Then after.
57multiple with 4000 = 228000.
And then 40 multiple with = 160000.
Then substrate 228000-160000 = 68000.
Then 2x multiple 3x so 6x.
6x = 68000.
2x into 3x = 68000.
3x = 34000.
And then 3x+ 4000.
So 34000 + 4000 = 38000.
(2)
Peka Pachuau said:
1 month ago
@All.
The question makes no sense. Because both of their salaries might not be the same, it can be different. How come we put x both in their salaries?
Anyone, please explain to me.
The question makes no sense. Because both of their salaries might not be the same, it can be different. How come we put x both in their salaries?
Anyone, please explain to me.
(2)
Ranjan said:
4 years ago
R/S = 2/3.
(R+4000) / (S+4000) = 40/57.
Putting the value of are = (2/3) S,
And get value s = 34000.
What is wrong in this? Please explain it.
(R+4000) / (S+4000) = 40/57.
Putting the value of are = (2/3) S,
And get value s = 34000.
What is wrong in this? Please explain it.
(2)
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers