Verbal Reasoning - Syllogism - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Syllogism - Syllogism 1 (Q.No. 1)
Directions to Solve
In each of the following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions numbered (1) and (2). You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer:
- (A) If only (1) conclusion follows
- (B) If only (2) conclusion follows
- (C) If either (1) or (2) follows
- (D) If neither (1) nor (2) follows and
- (E) If both (1) and (2) follow.
1.
Statements: Some actors are singers. All the singers are dancers.
Conclusions:
- Some actors are dancers.
- No singer is actor.
Answer: Option
Explanation:

Discussion:
74 comments Page 3 of 8.
Kiran said:
9 years ago
There should be common term present between two conclusions in case if conclusion contains NO.
Then the only answer will be either or option.
Eg- all men's are a duck.
NO men are duck.
If I'm wrong correct me.
Then the only answer will be either or option.
Eg- all men's are a duck.
NO men are duck.
If I'm wrong correct me.
Seema said:
9 years ago
You have study logic first. Can you solve mathematical problems without knowing formulas. There's no short cut.
Prakash singh said:
10 years ago
Very easy some actors are singers and all singers are dancer.
Kalpa said:
10 years ago
Reasoning is the best way to solve than any tricks. Read the question twice to get the answer.
Manasa said:
10 years ago
How to solve syllogism questions?
Trishul said:
1 decade ago
@Rajani, "All actors are dancers' can be converted into 'some actors are dancers' but not vice versa.
GauraV said:
1 decade ago
Is there any other easier trick?
Akilan said:
1 decade ago
Why not all actors are dancers? 2nd diagram very much confused.
Rajani a s said:
1 decade ago
Please help me anyone to understand syllogism in simple way.
Sindhu said:
1 decade ago
For question 2 in examples, I feel option (1) follows.
Some asses are not dogs is true right? since some asses are bulls (which implies they're not dogs). Please reply why not?
Some asses are not dogs is true right? since some asses are bulls (which implies they're not dogs). Please reply why not?
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers