Verbal Ability - Comprehension - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Comprehension - Section 4 (Q.No. 3)
Directions to Solve
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of acts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly started.
3.
The laws of nature based on observation are
Discussion:
9 comments Page 1 of 1.
Sandeep said:
1 decade ago
Would someone please give a proper explanation to this?
Rini said:
1 decade ago
Yea do explain, its quite dark to understand what author meant so.
Nyein said:
1 decade ago
Please show the related explanation for these questions. Because, most of these answers are not acceptable in my opinions.
Raghunath said:
1 decade ago
It is clearly given as "Laws of nature are not commands but statements of acts" which means laws are formed by the actions made by people to improve further.
So I agree with option D.
So I agree with option D.
Egor said:
1 decade ago
It's because life is not stagnant, species evolve and things are always changing and evolving, option D.
(1)
Amrutha said:
9 years ago
Results in a change of nature's law depend on how nature is affected by people every day and we are indirectly responsible for that daily changes so it tells 'light of new facts.
Anushka said:
8 years ago
However, the laws of nature are also a conclusion of observations and all fables, stories, episodes of history and even wars were fought on these conclusions. Elements of nature played an important part in daily lives starting from harvests to all other facets of life. I find A as a safer answer.
Deepak Narnoliya said:
8 years ago
It is written in the very first line "Laws of nature are not commands but statements of acts". So basically which means that Laws of nature are not rigid or static but they change with the need and actions of its surroundings.
This is asked in the question that laws of nature based on observation are:
1. As I said they can't be static or rigid so the first option does not follow.
2. There a fallacy has been stated regarding the laws so second option of being true and unfalsifiable does not follow.
3. They are not just imagination but true because nature is always around us.
Thus, I find option "D" to be a correct answer.
This is asked in the question that laws of nature based on observation are:
1. As I said they can't be static or rigid so the first option does not follow.
2. There a fallacy has been stated regarding the laws so second option of being true and unfalsifiable does not follow.
3. They are not just imagination but true because nature is always around us.
Thus, I find option "D" to be a correct answer.
(1)
Vivek Raj said:
5 years ago
I think the answer should be A.
(1)
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers