Online C Programming Test - C Programming Test - Random
- This is a FREE online test. Beware of scammers who ask for money to attend this test.
- Total number of questions: 20.
- Time allotted: 30 minutes.
- Each question carries 1 mark; there are no negative marks.
- DO NOT refresh the page.
- All the best!
Marks : 2/20
Test Review : View answers and explanation for this test.
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
char *s1;
char far *s2;
char huge *s3;
printf("%d, %d, %d\n", sizeof(s1), sizeof(s2), sizeof(s3));
return 0;
}
Any pointer size is 2 bytes. (only 16-bit offset)
So, char *s1 = 2 bytes.
So, char far *s2; = 4 bytes.
So, char huge *s3; = 4 bytes.
A far, huge pointer has two parts: a 16-bit segment value and a 16-bit offset value.
Since C is a compiler dependent language, it may give different output in other platforms. The above program works fine in Windows (TurboC), but error in Linux (GCC Compiler).
True, When a function is declared inside the source file, that function(local function) get a priority than the extern function. So there is no need to declare a function as extern inside the same source file.
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
short int i = 0;
for(i<=5 && i>=-1; ++i; i>0)
printf("%u,", i);
return 0;
}
for(i<=5 && i>=-1; ++i; i>0) so expression i<=5 && i>=-1 initializes for loop. expression ++i is the loop condition. expression i>0 is the increment expression.
In for( i <= 5 && i >= -1; ++i; i>0) expression i<=5 && i>=-1 evaluates to one.
Loop condition always get evaluated to true. Also at this point it increases i by one.
An increment_expression i>0 has no effect on value of i.so for loop get executed till the limit of integer (ie. 65535)
1. | Relational |
2. | Arithmetic |
3. | Logical |
4. | Assignment |
2. Arithmetic operators: *, /, %, +, -
1. Relational operators: >, <, >=, <=, ==, !=
3. Logical operators : !, &&, ||
4. Assignment operators: =
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
int i=-3, j=2, k=0, m;
m = ++i && ++j && ++k;
printf("%d, %d, %d, %d\n", i, j, k, m);
return 0;
}
Step 1: int i=-3, j=2, k=0, m; here variable i, j, k, m are declared as an integer type and variable i, j, k are initialized to -3, 2, 0 respectively.
Step 2: m = ++i && ++j && ++k;
becomes m = -2 && 3 && 1;
becomes m = TRUE && TRUE; Hence this statement becomes TRUE. So it returns '1'(one). Hence m=1.
Step 3: printf("%d, %d, %d, %d\n", i, j, k, m); In the previous step the value of i,j,k are increemented by '1'(one).
Hence the output is "-2, 3, 1, 1".
#include<stdio.h>
int addmult(int ii, int jj)
{
int kk, ll;
kk = ii + jj;
ll = ii * jj;
return (kk, ll);
}
int main()
{
int i=3, j=4, k, l;
k = addmult(i, j);
l = addmult(i, j);
printf("%d, %d\n", k, l);
return 0;
}
Step 1: int i=3, j=4, k, l; The variables i, j, k, l are declared as an integer type and variable i, j are initialized to 3, 4 respectively.
The function addmult(i, j); accept 2 integer parameters.
Step 2: k = addmult(i, j); becomes k = addmult(3, 4)
In the function addmult(). The variable kk, ll are declared as an integer type int kk, ll;
kk = ii + jj; becomes kk = 3 + 4 Now the kk value is '7'.
ll = ii * jj; becomes ll = 3 * 4 Now the ll value is '12'.
return (kk, ll); It returns the value of variable ll only.
The value 12 is stored in variable 'k'.
Step 3: l = addmult(i, j); becomes l = addmult(3, 4)
kk = ii + jj; becomes kk = 3 + 4 Now the kk value is '7'.
ll = ii * jj; becomes ll = 3 * 4 Now the ll value is '12'.
return (kk, ll); It returns the value of variable ll only.
The value 12 is stored in variable 'l'.
Step 4: printf("%d, %d\n", k, l); It prints the value of k and l
Hence the output is "12, 12".
No, In a function two return statements can occur but not successively.
Example:
#include <stdio.h>
int mul(int, int); /* Function prototype */
int main()
{
int a = 0, b = 3, c;
c = mul(a, b);
printf("c = %d\n", c);
return 0;
}
/* Two return statements in the mul() function */
int mul(int a, int b)
{
if(a == 0 || b == 0)
{
return 0;
}
else
{
return (a * b);
}
}
Output:
c = 0
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
float i=10, *j;
void *k;
k=&i;
j=k;
printf("%f\n", *j);
return 0;
}
The output: 10.000000
#include<stdio.h>
void fun(int **p);
int main()
{
int a[3][4] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 3, 2, 8, 7, 8, 9, 0};
int *ptr;
ptr = &a[0][0];
fun(&ptr);
return 0;
}
void fun(int **p)
{
printf("%d\n", **p);
}
Step 1: int a[3][4] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 3, 2, 8, 7, 8, 9, 0}; The variable a is declared as an multidimensional integer array with size of 3 rows 4 columns.
Step 2: int *ptr; The *ptr is a integer pointer variable.
Step 3: ptr = &a[0][0]; Here we are assigning the base address of the array a to the pointer variable *ptr.
Step 4: fun(&ptr); Now, the &ptr contains the base address of array a.
Step 4: Inside the function fun(&ptr); The printf("%d\n", **p); prints the value '1'.
because the *p contains the base address or the first element memory address of the array a (ie. a[0])
**p contains the value of *p memory location (ie. a[0]=1).
Hence the output of the program is '1'
1: | The array int num[26]; can store 26 elements. |
2: | The expression num[1] designates the very first element in the array. |
3: | It is necessary to initialize the array at the time of declaration. |
4: | The declaration num[SIZE] is allowed if SIZE is a macro. |
1. The array int num[26]; can store 26 elements. This statement is true.
2. The expression num[1] designates the very first element in the array. This statement is false, because it designates the second element of the array.
3. It is necessary to initialize the array at the time of declaration. This statement is false.
4. The declaration num[SIZE] is allowed if SIZE is a macro. This statement is true, because the MACRO just replaces the symbol SIZE with given value.
Hence the statements '1' and '4' are correct statements.
int fun(int arr[]);
int fun(int arr[2]);
No, both the statements are same. It is the prototype for the function fun() that accepts one integer array as an parameter and returns an integer value.
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
struct value
{
int bit1:1;
int bit3:4;
int bit4:4;
}bit;
printf("%d\n", sizeof(bit));
return 0;
}
Since C is a compiler dependent language, in Turbo C (DOS) the output will be 2, but in GCC (Linux) the output will be 4.
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
printf("%%%%\n");
return 0;
}
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
const int x;
x=128;
printf("%d\n", x);
return 0;
}
A const variable has to be initialized when it is declared. later assigning the value to the const variable will result in an error "Cannot modify the const object".
Hence Option B is correct