Logical Reasoning - Statement and Conclusion - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Statement and Conclusion - Section 1 (Q.No. 24)
Directions to Solve

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Give answer:

  • (A) If only conclusion I follows
  • (B) If only conclusion II follows
  • (C) If either I or II follows
  • (D) If neither I nor II follows and
  • (E) If both I and II follow.


24.

Statements: Money plays a vital role in politics.

Conclusions:

  1. The poor can never become politicians.
  2. All the rich men take part in politics.
Only conclusion I follows
Only conclusion II follows
Either I or II follows
Neither I nor II follows
Both I and II follow
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Neither the poor nor the rich, but only the role of money in politics is being talked about in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.
Discussion:
7 comments Page 1 of 1.

Hoboz said:   4 months ago
Money play a vital role in politics which means even a poor can become a politician if someone with money power play a role for him/her and also not all the rich people with money are interested to take part in politics.

So, option D is correct.

ZeroTwo said:   2 years ago
Poor and rich need not be associated with money all the time if you think carefully.

They can even be about one's personality or character; We are not certain about the aspect in which a person is poor or rich (poor or rich in finance) since it's not mentioned.

So, neither I nor II follows!

Preetham said:   5 years ago
In question, they had mentioned that (All rich men take part in politics). According to me, it is based on their interest to take part in politics. Not every rich man will go in politics.

Ajit said:   5 years ago
In the statement, it has been mentioned that money plays a vital role in politics and poor means low in money so I follows. Hence answer should be A.

Manideep said:   6 years ago
Yes, poor itself conveys they don't have money.

In rich, it is doubtful because they may have assets but poor in the sense in all aspects.

So, I think the answer is A but it's D.

Apoorva said:   7 years ago
Poor itself means that you are low on money. So how can "may" be introduced in that?

Rameshwar said:   1 decade ago
poor people may have money or may not have.........can be doubtful

rich people may have money or may not have.........can be doubtful

discuss it philosophically
both the statement are reasonably doubtful.......!!!!!!

Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.