Logical Reasoning - Statement and Assumption - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Statement and Assumption - Section 1 (Q.No. 11)
Directions to Solve

In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.

Give answer

  • (A) If only assumption I is implicit
  • (B) If only assumption II is implicit
  • (C) If either I or II is implicit
  • (D) If neither I nor II is implicit
  • (E) If both I and II are implicit.


11.

Statement: The Government has decided to levy 2 percent on the tax amount payable for funding drought relief programmes.

Assumptions:

  1. The Government does not have sufficient money to fund drought relief programmes.
  2. The amount collected by way of surcharge may be adequate to fund these drought relief programmes.

Only assumption I is implicit
Only assumption II is implicit
Either I or II is implicit
Neither I nor II is implicit
Both I and II are implicit
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Since a surcharge has been levied to fund drought relief programmes, it follows that the Government does not have sufficient money for the same. So, I is implicit. Besides, the percentage of surcharge must have been decided after studying the expected inflow in relation to amount of funds required. So, II is also implicit.
Discussion:
13 comments Page 1 of 2.

Solomon said:   6 years ago
1 is not implicit, the statement does not state anything about the government not having funds.
(9)

Mathi said:   6 years ago
How should we assume that the government not having the money?
(5)

Jauncy said:   4 years ago
Willingness to fund and ability to fund are two different things and the person who wrote 1 is implicit is conflating the two, please correct the answer.
(3)

Seenu888 said:   7 years ago
The statement doesnot talk about the funding. So, 1is not implicit according to the given statement.
(2)

Ramya said:   10 years ago
1 is not implicit as the statement does not mention about whether government have funds or not.
(1)

Rijuka Jain said:   7 years ago
According to me, both do not follow.

First one says about the government not having funds, but as it is not told it does not follow. Second one also doesn't follow because they haven't told anything about full or half. So both should not follow.
(1)

Karan said:   1 decade ago
A Govt doesnt not have money. This is pity for govt the answer are wrong a govt should have money and should not impose tax on the fund at least.

Rohit said:   1 decade ago
II would not be implicit as statement do not say any thing about adequacy of fund there might be other options also which govt had considered and this one may be only a part of it.

Kusumika said:   10 years ago
A is not implicit. Maybe the government has money but it doesn't want to utilize the money on it. So how is A an assumption?

Jee said:   9 years ago
II also not implicit because it does not mention anything about the surcharge.


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.