# Logical Reasoning - Statement and Argument - Discussion

### Discussion :: Statement and Argument - Section 1 (Q.No.29)

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

• (A) If only argument I is strong
• (B) If only argument II is strong
• (C) If either I or II is strong
• (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
• (E) If both I and II are strong.

29.

Statement: Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals?

Arguments:

1. Yes. Trappers are making a lot of money;
2. No. Bans on hunting and trapping are not effective.

 [A]. Only argument I is strong [B]. Only argument II is strong [C]. Either I or II is strong [D]. Neither I nor II is strong [E]. Both I and II are strong

Explanation:

Clearly, ban is necessary to protect our natural environment. So, none of the arguments is strong enough.

 Arthur said: (Oct 25, 2013) A ban may not be necessary if there is an explosion in an animals population.

 Dave said: (Sep 25, 2015) Firstly the statement isn't a statement at all; it's a question. If pretending it is a statement, then the explanation cannot be deduced from it. There could be pestilent numbers of wild animals that are destroying the natural environment, for example. Argument I is not strong because the earnings of the trappers are at best immaterial, or possibly a good if the trapping of wild animals is a good. Argument II is strong because it is a statement that hunting and trapping are not effective appropriate a ban is innately wasteful. Protecting the natural environment might be a very good thing to do. But in this context it's a rubbish example for a reasoning question.