Logical Reasoning - Course of Action - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Course of Action - Section 1 (Q.No. 4)
Directions to Solve
In each question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Give answer
- (A) If only I follows
- (B) If only II follows
- (C) If either I or II follows
- (D) If neither I nor II follows
- (E) If both I and II follow.
4.
Statement: Exporters in the capital are alleging that commercial banks are violating a Reserve Bank of India directive to operate a post shipment export credit denominated in foreign currency at international rates from January this year.
Courses of Action:
- The officers concerned in the commercial banks are to be suspended.
- The RBI should be asked to stop giving such directives to commercial banks.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
The statement mentions that the commercial banks violate a directive issued by the RBI. The remedy is only to make the banks implement the Act. So, none of the courses follows.
Discussion:
14 comments Page 1 of 2.
Kosecsy Pachipulusula said:
2 years ago
The officers concerned in the commercial banks are to be suspended.
This course of action seems too extreme as the first step. Instead of immediate suspension, an investigation into the alleged violations could be conducted to determine the extent of non-compliance. If found guilty, appropriate disciplinary action, including suspension, could be taken against the responsible officers.
The RBI should be asked to stop giving such directives to commercial banks.
This course of action does not directly address the issue of alleged violations by commercial banks. Instead of stopping directives, a better approach might be for the concerned parties to engage in dialogue to understand the reason behind the alleged violations and work towards a resolution that ensures compliance with the RBI directive.
It's important to address the root cause of the problem and work towards a solution that ensures compliance with regulatory directives while also addressing any potential issues faced by commercial banks in implementing the directive.
This course of action seems too extreme as the first step. Instead of immediate suspension, an investigation into the alleged violations could be conducted to determine the extent of non-compliance. If found guilty, appropriate disciplinary action, including suspension, could be taken against the responsible officers.
The RBI should be asked to stop giving such directives to commercial banks.
This course of action does not directly address the issue of alleged violations by commercial banks. Instead of stopping directives, a better approach might be for the concerned parties to engage in dialogue to understand the reason behind the alleged violations and work towards a resolution that ensures compliance with the RBI directive.
It's important to address the root cause of the problem and work towards a solution that ensures compliance with regulatory directives while also addressing any potential issues faced by commercial banks in implementing the directive.
(1)
Fama said:
4 years ago
I think the right answer should be option A.
(3)
Ojas said:
5 years ago
The Right answer is D.
RBI is the head itself which set norms in the welfare of the economy.
And suspend of officers is a harsh action.
RBI is the head itself which set norms in the welfare of the economy.
And suspend of officers is a harsh action.
(1)
Nayan said:
5 years ago
I think the answer is A because it is written that " officers concerned" which states that they are responsible for the violation and thus, should be suspended.
(1)
Tanisha said:
5 years ago
The correct answer should be option D.
It is quite possible that the officers are forced to violate RBI directives under the pressure of the higher authorities of the commercial bank. Thus the matter must be investigated and action must be taken against the main person responsible for causing such nuisance.
It is quite possible that the officers are forced to violate RBI directives under the pressure of the higher authorities of the commercial bank. Thus the matter must be investigated and action must be taken against the main person responsible for causing such nuisance.
Yash said:
5 years ago
I think the correct answer is A.
Divya said:
8 years ago
I am really confused on this question. Because in course of action A it is talking about suspension. And I think that giving an ultimatum or warning is far better course of action than suspending him. But the answer is quite the opposite.
Please anyone explain me.
Please anyone explain me.
Anu said:
9 years ago
We can't harsh action like suspension but not sure about 2 so 1 Statement is not valid.
Balaji said:
10 years ago
In this case, Commercial bank could have made a call to violate RBI directive. Hence suspending the officers may not be relevant, secondly the statement doesn't talk about any authority hence D is correct.
Swapnil said:
1 decade ago
As per my understanding answer should (B). As Reserve bank has right to ask to stop giving such directives to commercial banks.
As far as (A) is concerned bank can not suspend the concerned officers without giving warning letters. So only (B) is valid answer.
What do you think guys?
As far as (A) is concerned bank can not suspend the concerned officers without giving warning letters. So only (B) is valid answer.
What do you think guys?
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers