Logical Reasoning - Course of Action - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Course of Action - Section 3 (Q.No. 31)
Directions to Solve
In each question below is given a statement followed by three courses of action numbered I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the three given suggested courses of action logically follows for pursuing.
31.
Statement: The exodus from villages to cities is detrimental to both.
Courses of Action:
- Rural postings must be made mandatory.
- There should be fewer trains linking cities to smaller places.
- Employment generation scheme should be launched in rural areas.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Clearly, the exodus cannot be stopped by reducing the number of trains. So, II does not follow. The exodus occurs primarily due to better employment opportunities and facilities in the cities. Hence, it can be prevented not by compulsion but by making conditions favourable for those residing in villages. So, I does not follow while III follows.
Discussion:
Be the first person to comment on this question !
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers