Women are not fit for Defense Services

In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with women serving in defence, it's one of the best opportunities to contribute to the nation. There are different branches in the defense sector, People often think that women lack physical strength, but I believe that mental strength is far more important than physical ability. Women can choose their path based on their ambitions. Ultimately, it's not about gender; it's about serving the nation, and anyone who can contribute should have the opportunity to do so.

According to me, women are not fit for defence forces because they have responsibilities for their families and children so they will not be able to manage both or not able to do both at a time.

Hello friends, I would like to express my view on this topic.

According to me, Women are fit for roles in defence forces. Yes, maybe in terms of physical strength men maybe strong, but we have many examples were women in defence forces like airforce, navy, army have led examples and served the country. If they are able to pass test given by defence head successfully then they must be allowed. Both men and women are officers and gender should not be an obstacle to serve the country.

Good evening. Friends.

Today we are juncture here to discuss a serious topic women in the armed forces so now I am telling you about my views on it.

All we know for defence technical services there has no single doubt that women are equal to men mentally.

According to me, who are strong enough to fight with men so if girls do everything like playing outdoor games with boys and practice with them they surely will be able to get that fitness that men have so it depends on them if they want to do what they can do.

If they were given training like you guys then definitely they will able to manage their physical strength.

The problem is within our minds and in our way of thinking because if a woman can take care of a family why can't she take care of a country?

If they wanna be a soldier or a wrestler just support them.

That's all.

Thanks.

Most of women are emotionally connect to their family and give it priority. You need to sacrifice your emotion to serve the country better with priority or believe that's whole your country is your family and you will strongly never comparison between them.

On a candor note, one may think that women are not fit the military but we cannot simply assume it without looking at some facts, to begin with men or boys are actually are stronger than women ie the upper body strength in a male is 55% more than a female and 27% more strength in the male low body (which is a SCIENTIFIC fact that's been proven over and over, however, there may be some exceptions).

Furthermore, the military has standards which everyone needs to meet (men and women both) in order to enlist or to make it to field combat duty, which begins at the basic training boot camp, with a series of obstacles and a bare minimum required to pass, over the years almost all of the men were able to pass the minimum while the majority of the women were not able to, this escalated into blaming the military that the basic training obstacles are difficult for women and are keeping them from perusing their military carriers, that the bare minimum was lowered for them so that they could pass, which still wasn\'t a bright idea since even then a good number of women still failed.

Adding to that United States Marine Corps study experiment conducted proved that compared to female units, the all-male units had a noticeable difference in their performance they were faster in each tactical movement, had better accuracy, were quicker to register more hits on target, and were able to overcome obstacles and evacuate casualties without any difficulty, with women who are the above-average performing females were only equal to the average performing males (However this can vary from individual to Individual) That being said, Yes! women have to be allowed in military positions. HR, telecommunication officers, radar operators, technical services etc are great for women (also same for some men). However, almost all men in basic training were good at essential jobs which require peak physical strength, endurance, speed, agility in order not to jeopardize other unit members with subpar performance, because life literally hangs in the balance so be it a man or a woman if they can carry a 6 foot 200 pound wounded grunt with an additional 80-pound gear while taking enemy fire, and being able to fight off in a hand to hand combat against a trained enemy killer who won't discriminate against gender then whoever, man or women that can meet this standard are most welcomed to the front lines.

But otherwise having women in the military with lowered standards is a hyper hazard and the delusional feministic indoctrination will end up putting soldiers in body bags.

Hello, we are here to discuss that whether women fit for defence service or not.

Let's start;

* All we know for defence technical services there have no single doubt that women are equal to men mentally.

*Next in field duty, some think that women have loose body they can't bear the pain.

But we also figure the fact that even not all men are fit for defence. Whereas women like Rani Lakhsmibai, for now Mary Com and also there have other examples, who are strong enough to fight with men. So, if girls do everything like playing outdoor games with boys, practice with them then they surely will be able got that fitness what men have.

* So it depends on them if they want to do they can do.

Hey there, while reading the views of different personalities of our nation I find some positive thinkers towards the topic and some agreed with the point that women should not fit for defense as '' their participation makes war ugly, and only men have given the right to protect their nation ''. This statement is really very annoying for us. We all know about rani Lakshmi Bayi and her determination towards her kingdom, right? Does the participation of her in the war against Britishers for freedom of our country make war ugly ? when some men were promoting them of destruction of our country then women like her were standing making eye to eye contact with their enemies, and you people are saying it make war ugly. And also a wrong rumour inside us that women are physically weaker than men. Then I would like to tell them they are not fit by birth but this potential is developed inside them later on, if we talk about women's they are taught to participate more in house chores and if they were given training like you guys then definitely they will able to manage their physical strength.

Hi friends.

This is Krishna, so today's topic is women are not fit for defence purposes. I would like to share my views in front of you all.

1) on whole men and women are strong in their own way. They can choose anything they like.

2) Usually there is a popular belief that men are both physically and mentally stronger than women but in view, it's a big no because how can compare a woman who keeps a child inside her for nine months and also take care of a family.

3) If a woman can do such works, why can't she take part in the defence sector?

4) The problem is within our minds and in our way of thinking because if a woman can take care of a family why can't she take care of a country.

5) Don't encourage them that they can't do this or that, let them do what they wish to. If they wanna be a soldier or a wrestler just support them.

Thank you.

Hello friends.

Woman are fit for defence services because all defence jobs are not like in fight some defence work like a jet pilot, army kernel, airforce officer, etc. T. And a woman is fit for defence services because a man defence e-services job joining not suddenly fit for defence services a man completed our training and he fit for defence services and a woman completed training she clerly fit for defence services.