Whether Digital Education has taken over Traditional Education?

I think both the ways has a unique advantages as well as disadvantages.

In digital education we learn things whenever we want like me I like to study in night time so it is very much useful for me and cost of eductaion is also less compared to offline.

In offline education we have direct interaction with teachers it enable to ask douts at a time.

And it helps to meet new peoples and we share our opinions to colleagues and we also learn more things from them.

Yes, from my point of view, digital education has taken over the traditional education system and it is valid enough. It has been most beneficial to the poor students, it has proved to be a lucrative deal for them as a very negligible cost, the poor students are able to obtain a quality education. I said the cost negligible because the cost of internet packs in our mobile phones is really negligible in front of the school fees which we have to pay.

Also, if someone is interested in taking distance education from a university of his/her choice, then sitting at home, he/she can apply for the course, pay for it online and learn the same thing digitally which some of the students are learning there physically. And sometimes it also happens that the universities provide discounts on their fee structures only on their digital learning programs, that proves to be another advantage.

In this case, a student is not bound to any kind of time table if he/she is learning from you tube or similar sites as the concerned may visit the site and attend the lectures any time and from the point where he/she dropped it. This gives one more advantage that the student here has many choices like the faculty which is teaching, the language in which the lecture is being delivered, content, etc. This allows the student to take quality education. And it is fact that a human mind is more responsive to videos rather than looking at the same faculty daily in the same classroom. Here comes the another advantage, digital education is mobile education, i.e. you are not bound to a particular place which helps to keep your mind fresh. Also as compared to traditional system of education, digital education will always offer you ALL THE LATEST facts and figures which is not possible for a faculty in classroom or a book.

But, as we all know that a coin has two faces. So there are also some pros of traditional education like it helps us to improve our presentation skills, it keeps our life disciplined, it enhances our listening skills, grasping power and attentiveness. But these few pros of the traditional education system and the same few cons of digital education cannot dominate those many advantages of digital education. So, digital education has taken over the traditional educational system.

Thanks.

Friends here we should know about the question that what it is trying to say.

Friends according to me, the digital education has overtaken the traditional education because nowadays most of the students in their school can't maintain their study due to many reasons like environment around them but at home, they can learn by YouTube and many other applications and can save their costly time.

They also can clear their confusion by seeing the video again but in traditional education now a days teachers become irritate and scold the students and students become scared and due to this terror students.

Never ask his teacher about his/her other problems. Due to which confusion cannot be cleared which is very harmful for them and that can spoil their whole life.

According to me, the Digital education is better than traditional education because of digital classes students can understand the topics very easily and he/she remember the topic for longer period and its smart way to connect students giving proper knowledge, suppose we can take an example of movies or any sports people are paying more attention to them because it goes deep to their mind.

So, according to me, its a very good to encourage digital era and its very beneficial to students in the present situation.

According to me, both ways are correct in their own manner if you are able to afford or manipulate with the technologies then go for it.

It has many benefits it develops more interest towards the topic you learning about it upgrades your skills and make you more innovative. Whether the traditional can help you in that manner to make you more active and you can use your own thoughts and willpower to education.

It makes your physical appearance more important in the learning society.

According to my point of view, Yes, Digital Education is taking over Traditional Education. Digital Education is being done by YouTube, google search engine and many more. Its enhances the understanding power of students. Most advantage is that Students can relate to the practical Life. But as we know every coin has two side Students cannot learn d behaviour from the Digital Education. Traditional Education has an importance which has gone done, here students behaviour is been taught.

In my opinion, it is to say that digital education has taken over traditional education is no much meaningful.

We can say that digital education enhances the practical knowledge of traditional education, it makes more effective.

In modern times via digital education we get every knowledge via online search engine eg google, you tube video but also there is some contradiction in different videos from which we get some confusion there is a need of traditional education, apart from that digital education helpful for gaining more knowledge, doing some projects online.

So making digital education more effective we.

Should take help via traditional education whenever needed such as making interaction with tutors, seniors to transfer knowledge.

Apart from that, there is a need for tutors having good knowledge of technology tools which is helpful for the area where people are no much familiar with these tools and their benefits.

So we conclude that by the riding of traditional education we make digital education more effective in practical manners for general people.

According to me, as everything in the world has two phases, in the same way, digital and traditional education has two phases.

In favour to digital study:

1. One can study any where at any time.
2. We can have updated information very soon comparing to offline.
3. It is a own learning process.
4. Do course at University level without going there.

In favour to traditional education:

1. We can increase presentation skills by class.
2. We can know how to behave with colleagues and superiors.

Conclusion:.

I would like to conclude that digital education cannot be a substitute for classroom learning up to graduation level. If a person has more interest on the online education they can do well but if they have no interest a person must be there to create interest in him by general example and to make them study, that is possible only with the classroom.

Yes, by the digital education the children do not have a direct contact with teacher.

Digital Education has taken over the Traditional education in a bigger way. In the olden days the only source of knowledge was through books. But it was quite difficult for the common man to know about books where in which they can find the knowledge they want. If somehow they get to know about the book it still difficult to find the market where in which he can buy the book. Even if he could able to find out a shop in which the book is available it is difficult for the common man to bear the cost of the purchase. This was the traditional system. But with the advent of Internet things had changed upside down. Now every knowledge is at the our finger tips. Every problem of the traditional education system is overcomed. If we have the quest for knowledge then the world is open for us. No limit to attaining knowledge.