Tobacco must be banned. Yes or No.

In my opinion, baning is not a solution to this or any other problem, because if you ban a product it would lead to illegal marketing of that product. For eg. In Gujrat liquor is ban still a huge number of people consume it illegally. A good solution to this problem is to create awareness and to find alternative solutions to this problem. Like nicotine could help effectively. Banning would also lead to an increase in the price of tobacco products, eventually if one wants to have it he will get it in high rates. Thousands of tribal people are in tobacco business and farming; they would be lost their jobs. Excess to anything is injuries. So rather than banning, better planning is needed.

In my opinion the tobacco must be banned. I support my statement with a number of valid reasons.

First of all, it causes different types of cancer mouth cancer and also it damages internal body parts.

Tobacco makes the people addicted to it and gives temporary good feeling by causing permanent damage in our body.
I don't see any uses of it. The tobacco not only causes the person to get suffer from cancer and also the spitting of tobacco in open areas may leads to spreading different diseases. There are many dangerous diseases that can be spread to air and the saliva. It also makes the surroundings unhealthy. My conclusion is that the tobacco should be banned for many good reasons.

In my opinion, baning is not a solution to this or any other problem, because if you ban a product it would lead to illegal marketing of that product. For eg. In gujrat liquor is ban still a huge number of people consume it illegally. A good solution to this problem is to create awareness and to find alternative solutions to this problem. Like nicotine could help effectively. Banning would also lead to an increase in the price of tobacco products, eventually if one wants to have it he will get it in high rates. Thousands of tribal people are in tobacco business and farming; they would be lost their jobs. Excess to anything is injuries. So rather than banning better planning is needed.

Good morning friends.

Thank you for giving me an opportunity to discuss tobacco must be banned or not.

In my point of view, tobacco must be banned by our government for people, not for whom who stand at ice land like our Indian army who take alcohol for do their duty properly and we all are known that how much dangerous for our youth and family also and we also have known that youth and teenager also addicted from it and it is a bad addiction that ruined our family, waste money, keep our fitness and mind unhealthy and it causes many bad things for civilians particularly middle-class family so my opinion is tobacco must be banned but not for our ice-land army. Jai Hind.

Thank you.

According to me, tobacco should be banned if the Government Could fight with it's consequences. E.G. After banning tobacco many people will lose their jobs, the government will not get revenue from it and people who are addicted to tobacco, their mental health will get worse and then they will take tobacco illegally. So it will increase job crisis and bad activities.

So if the Government Has some alternatives plan for employment and Government Can aware of people about health issues by tobacco and makes rehab centres for a large no. Of people then government Should ban the tobacco.

But if there is no pre-planning for it then government Shouldn't be banned the tobacco.

Thank you.

Here's my thought

Tobacco contains some dangerous gases like carbon monoxide and hydrogencianade. These two gases are harmful to the one who smokes it tobacco and to the surroundings who are all near them.

Tobacco causes serious lung damage by filling the dangerous gases previously mentioned, so it leads them and the surroundings to suffer from asthma which is also a dangerous disease by suffering people through cough.

The cough infected through asthma leads to severe death and reaches from 250000 to 461000 annually estimation to the World Health Organization.

So, My personal opinion is tobacco will make you a scenario hero but it kills you inch by inch.

Beware of it

The Most common forms of tobacco that are taken in India are Khaini, Zarda, etc. That a common man and even the underprivileged can buy. Or only these sorts of people has it generally.

These things cause harm not only to the one who primarily consumes them but also to those who are in the surroundings. As well as slows down the thought process and tries to let these poor daily wage labourers be in the way they are no progressiveness.

And also causes solid waste problems and air pollution and negativity in the ecosystem.

So if Indian govt requires taxes for the social welfare of its citizens ultimates, so it will be social welfare itself if it bans all forms of tobacco.

Hello everyone.

@Sourav
As you said, if we ban tobacco, the victim may alter to another substance like that. Yeah, that's true, it depends on the individual. Why can't he/she be in good substance? Not everyone will addicted to another bad substance in my view. So harmful Tobacco must be banned to avoid severe health hazards and addiction and also sir mentioned that we can create awareness to control. Already in alcohol and cigar packs, the company mentioned the harmful effects with disgusting images. After seeing those warnings, many of them still consume those things. So there is no point in creating awareness of those things. Obviously, Tobacco must be banned.

Good evening everyone,

In my point of view, tobacco is bad for our health also there are many negative impacts. But suddenly we can't ban tobacco because the sudden ban of tobacco may highly impact the mental state of the consumer who consumes it. Due to it being an addiction, it had a high impact on the consumers. They may take illegal action to get tobacco.

Also, this industry highly contributes to our economy. We can do some that like increasing the price of tobacco periodically. Also, I agree with the harsh point that in India 29 percent of adults consume tobacco. Therefore for government has to action on restrictions on age limits like a minimum of 22 ages.

In my opinion, tobacco should not be banned because once tobacco banned the chain smokers will search for other alternatives like cocaine, hashish which will rather result in serious health and social problems.

Also, there are many people whose survival depends on the earnings from selling tobacco. On banning the tobacco their daily life will be difficult.

And above all these tobacco bans will decrease the tax amount that we get from selling tobacco which eventually results in decreasing the GDP of the country.

So, I believe that apart from the idea to ban tobacco the idea to reduce it's production and thereby reducing its consumption will be fruitful.