Tobacco must be banned. Yes or No.

In my opinion, tobacco should not be banned because it can have a direct impact in lowering the GDP level of the economy and also may result in a decrease in the per capita income of the economy. As India is still a developing country most of the part of India is agrarian economy hence tobacco is the major source of income for many people. Also, I would like to share its cons i.e. Tobacco is not harmful, the problem lies in the way of usage. Anything consumed in abundance is harmful. So before using tobacco, you should keep in mind its causes.

Thank you.

Tobacco is injuries to health. Many people are addicted to tobacco. But sudden change of this system affect more on economic system. Tobacco leads to cancer and astama. If the government improves the taxes on tobacco there may chances to safe some families.

Hello Friends,

In my point of view,

Tobacco must be banned because it is injurious to our health. People who are consuming excess tobacco will suffer from cancer, asthma etc.

As, it causes various diseases, On the pack of tabacco there is strict warning on it, but people are consuming in the excess amount which causes lung cancer.

It automatically damage our health so it must be banned.

According to my point of view, tobacco must not be banned in India because it affects the economy of our country.

So, it is true it is injurious to health but tobacco is not harmful people use it and the harmful things if people control themselves then it's not harmful to them and they can save their life.

Hello friends,

My opinion on this topic is;

* Tobacco should not be banned because it will impact on our Indian economy.

* The tobacco is exported to other countries also in a very high range so it will affect our economy.

* Another thing is that already one pack of tobacco is written that is injurious to health so every people know and it depends on them and their life. They have their rights they have to take it or not.

* As tobacco is harmful so awareness should be there and limitations.

* Tobacco is not harmful humans are making tobacco harmful for their lives by taking unlimitedly

Anything which humans will take in exceed will harm. So tobacco should not be banned in my opinion.

In my opinion, Tobacco should be banned, because we see young people using it continuously. And it is harmful to the next generation. So in my point of view tobacco is banned in India.

In my opinion, tobacco must be banned because many people lost their lives and suffered many harmful problems including (Asthma Cancer etc just because of excess consumption and they are habitual of using it government would not take any strict action to stop the demand for these injuries product because it's their other source of income that's why they don't do anything just keep the supply to make the people fool.

Friends as topic is tobacco must be banned or not.

First of all, I would like to highlight the importance of tobacco in terms of the economy. In India, many people are addicted to tobacco. Now coming to the important point everything has two aspects. As tobacco contributes higher tax to the govt and helps in India's economy. But If we see other aspects so it is injurious to health and one of the reasons for cancer. And also at young age youth are facing heart disease and fatigue due to inhaling tobacco. Tobacco is harmful not only to health but also to societies, and the environment. So, my point of view is that tobacco should not be banned besides it should be provided in limits with some norms.

I don't think there is a need to ban tobacco, it is definitely bad for health and it also creates revenue for the country but in the end, it is just a product which is not healthy for us, just like many others. There is an argument to be made that butter is equally bad for health, but we cannot ban butter, can we? It is just a product that people consume. Even if it's not good for health people have the right to choose what they put in their body as long as they are well informed about the consequences of their actions. I'll conclude by saying that there is no need to change how tobacco is sold, other than enforcing the legal age of consumption.

According to me tobacco should not be banned by the government because it contributes a large part of funds to the government and it helps our economy to boost not directly but indirectly. Moreover, banning these tobacco and narcotic companies would somehow decrease the growth of the economy and the government will have to suffer that loss because a lot of taxes are collected through these companies.

However, there should be a law or any kind of rule to keep teenagers away from tobacco addiction. Teenagers are not mature enough to know what would be the consequences of taking these tobaccos into use. So, there should be a rule of using tobacco, Government should impose a law on the company to not produce and sell the tobacco to the young people of the country.

In addition to this, if young people keep using tobacco then their body get addicted to that and even if they want to quit the use of tobacco their body won't allow them to do so.

Hence, it is extremely important to impose some rules and regulations on the narcotic companies so that we can save the Indian youth from these bad addictions.