Should We Pursue our Policy of Dialogue with Pakistan?

Our Indian government has been a great example of tolerating, in front of Pakistan. But each and every time Pakistan didn't respond in favour of dialogue. Always showed arms and ammunition power thinking that Indian govt will sit and resolve over meeting, but no. This is not what is actually happening. I'm not asking to start of a war, but India should try to be rebellion. Pakistan does not have a freaking idea about how India will be if they start resolving issues with arms and ammunition.

I think India should dialogue policy continue because if we will go for direct war then it will definitely bring for both countries but if we keep dialogue continue then it will keep our value up in UNO and it is necessity for us if we want to be permanent member of un security council.

And also as pak is taking step toward stop terrorism because it is harming pak more than India. So I think it will be good for us.

According to my opinion Pakistan is a permanent cheater as we know from our past attempt on peace a great lesson that we should take from Kargil war a very good attempt of Atal government with Nawaz but what happened, this is only formality of peace between each country.

As we know India has biggest power then why not we will take action strongly and we should never faith on Pakistan but what our government do they only used to ban the cricket match only.

Hello Everyone,

This is Ghanshyam.

I think we should continue our dialogue of peace with Pakistan because Pakistan is not the actual problem. Problem is the terrorism prevailing there who doesn't want peace between two country.

So whenever a talk of peace is done between two country they come into action. And as we are the one of the developing nation we have too many problems like poverty, corruption and many more, which can be grown to worst if we engage in war. And country like china will take advantage of the war. So, in my opinion we should continue the talk for peace with Pakistan.

1) Dialogue with Pakistan is little bit sweet and sour experience for India remain so for.

2) Pakistani basically formed on the basis of religion so extremists always has dominating factor in Relation between India and Pakistan.

3) India got great leader after independence and Pakistan failed to occupy the same.

4) Pakistan has had mostly military power in the past so relation with India also determined by the army.

5) Pakistan favours thought of good terrorism and bad terrorism.

6) Pakistan is now nuclear capable country. It has capability to deter India.

7) Pakistan is always supported by China which it call all weather friend.

8) China will never accept growing influence of India in the world.

9) Chinese company finds very easy way to earn profit in Pakistan.

10) China has acquired land in the form of gift from Pakistan to counter India all around.

11) India wants to lead in every field in the world. Leaving Pakistan alone and not to have talk will cause drawback before India.

12) Pakistan is a Muslim country and most part of the world are Muslim or mostly rich country are rich in resources.

13) To have place in greatest influence body like permanent seat in NSG or UNSC.

14) Pakistan is a our neighbour country. Talking with Pakistan will come in this consideration.

15) Pakistan is rich in some resources like productive agriculture land. So whenever requirement is there we can earn it easily like in case of onion shortfall. This will fulfill our requirement.

There is no doubt about it now - India has a problem, a big one, and it is Pakistan. But the real statement is, or should be - India has a problem, a big one, and it is the non-civil-government agents of Pakistan, who are out of civilian control totally.

I have worded this carefully, as I understand that. Pakistan's civil government may actually want peace with India. Pakistan's army may not entirely want disturbance this side of its border as they are at the receiving end of terror anyway.

Pakistan's non-civil actors (some fringes of its army, or the ISI, or some radical break-away groups or some radical individuals) may never want peace with India.

Some terror groups that are enemies of Pakistan may carry out attacks here in India as that suits their final motive (India gets angry, talks derail, skirmishes happen, Pakistan pays a price etc).

Irrespective of the subtleties of the argument describing today's situation, India is definitely a loser in it, as our sole worthy aim - raising the hundreds of millions out of poverty and into prosperity - gets defeated. Our focus dilutes. We deviate. The national debates change all over again.

Not good meanwhile, uncle Xi smiles in Beijing. He would be happy India is temporarily derailed. His huge One-Road-One-Belt strategy could ask for nothing else. If India loses its way, China gains in a big way (a crudely put statement that's true nonetheless especially given the increasing difficulty Xi faces in controlling democratic impulses of his citizens now).

So what can India do? We must ensure that a separate dedicated part of our foreign service is created solely for Pakistan and China issues (so that the larger world engagement does not suffer at all).

We must repeatedly remind everyone that prosperity and economic growth is crucial to the Indian dream, irrespective of terror attacks (as that alone will ensure our hotheads stay in control - poverty is big problem).

We develop trade linkages with Pakistan as economic ties cool sectarian tensions substantially. We remain united internally.

Hi friends,

In my opinion it is better to continue the peace talks with Pakistan. As we are still developing country, we have so many issues like corruption, Naxalism, poverty, etc. For the country to develop and become a super power, it must have good relations with neighboring countries.

We know that Pakistan has its own issues that halting it's development. India is well known for its peace in dealing with sensitive issues. Helping each other to resolve the issues of both nations like helping Pakistan to eradicate terrorism. Latest incident at pathankot makes the need for talks with Pakistan to eradicate terrorism in that country.

I feel, we were engaged in war with Pakistan from so many years. But what is the use China third country is coming and taking advantage of situation. We as responsible should have talks and take Pakistan in confidence. And make them realize that there are many problems to solve rather than fighting over Kashmir. They already have taken 30% of Kashmir (POK) even China took aksai chin, so lets not take fights further but live in peace and harmony.

Just fighting over these things won't help both countries, as Pakistan also has faced various terrorist attacks, they are also feeling the evil of terrorism, so its right opportunity to take Pakistan in confidence and sort out the issues. And I am confident present govt will do it successfully.

Jai Hind.

Yes definitely we should not purse policy of dialogue with Pakistan. Kashmir is a integral part of India. Pakistan always interfer in internal matters of India and try to seize Kashmir. Due to militancy lakhs of people left their home in Kashmir and migrated to other states.

War is not solution. Rather than talk to Pakistan, India should talk to people who were migrated from Kashmir and local residents of Kashmir what they want and want to do exactly.

Hi friends.

According to my opinion we should not keep any relationship with Pakistan because whenever we are going to do something good in favor of Pakistan, they thinks we are taking some benefits.

In Pakistan there is many wisdom people they think only about themselves. Only promote terrorism and violation. All terrorist attack had executed by them. Pakistan always hearts us. So I think we should not keep any relationship with Pakistan.