Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
187 comments Page 12 of 19.
DEEPIKA said:
1 year ago
Hello mates,
Every coin has two sides. NOTA has both pros and cons. NOTA shows the dissatisfaction level of the people.
But, In my point of view, there should not be a NOTA option because the people who don't know NOTA, unknowingly press the NOTA. Because of these activities.
That the election committee should appoint a good elective nominee before the election itself.
Every coin has two sides. NOTA has both pros and cons. NOTA shows the dissatisfaction level of the people.
But, In my point of view, there should not be a NOTA option because the people who don't know NOTA, unknowingly press the NOTA. Because of these activities.
That the election committee should appoint a good elective nominee before the election itself.
(5)
Sam said:
2 years ago
By providing nota as an option to the voters the democracy levels will increase along with the improvement of leadership. This is because, every single vote is important and where the win margin is less than the nota votes, parties will evaluate to get nota votes for their candidates in the next election. Hence candidates will be chosen who have worked at ground level.
(6)
Gandhi bhomik said:
9 years ago
Yes, I think that there should be options of NOTA then the voter should have a chance that if the voter is not like to vote that all candidate then he can vote on None of the above and save his/her vote that any body can not use his vote.
I appeal to all that whenever there is a voting go and please vote if you don't like the candidates then vote to NOTA.
Thank you.
I appeal to all that whenever there is a voting go and please vote if you don't like the candidates then vote to NOTA.
Thank you.
(6)
SIVAKUMAR said:
3 years ago
My opinion about this topic is People vote for nota feel like no one candidate is the right person that's why to press the note option. But those are voted for this option note no use at the same time there is no big changes at the election because more than 75% have for Nota may move the next step otherwise no use. But people willing to participate least too.
Thanks
Thanks
(2)
Tanmay Sharma said:
9 years ago
Hello, I am Tanmay.
My opinion says NOTA will not be the right option as,
1. NOTA absolutely take us to the worse condition i.e. Re-election which causes many factors.
2. IF any party led with the certain votes than the votes given in NOTA will be a waste.
Rather than giving the votes to the other party who we think is better, because that vote will be utilized.
My opinion says NOTA will not be the right option as,
1. NOTA absolutely take us to the worse condition i.e. Re-election which causes many factors.
2. IF any party led with the certain votes than the votes given in NOTA will be a waste.
Rather than giving the votes to the other party who we think is better, because that vote will be utilized.
(3)
Ranjan Kumar mishra said:
10 years ago
NOTA is an extra advantage given by the EC to voters, it's a step to clean up the corrupt politician but this is not enough a lot of things has to be done in this area to filter, many people don't know what is parliament, assembly the seats there which party will form the government after their voting. I think EC of India researchers a mechanism in this area also.
(2)
Amrendra kumar said:
7 years ago
Nota is not the best option for the people to show their own aggression. Today we all are living in a democratic country. If we put their importance in nota it's only a waste of time. We must have to choose a candidate which do for the welfare of our country. We have to think over that if we have the power to choose him then don't forget we can reject him also.
(22)
Aadi chikhale said:
9 years ago
1. Sometimes voter hopes to that person who really care about them and who make something for general people.
2. But sometimes voter gives vote only for NOTA.
3. SO I concluded all voters are not same that's why we can't say it's wrong. Finally, it's all depends on priority.
4. I think who really change N develop our status those requirements. Vite.
2. But sometimes voter gives vote only for NOTA.
3. SO I concluded all voters are not same that's why we can't say it's wrong. Finally, it's all depends on priority.
4. I think who really change N develop our status those requirements. Vite.
(3)
Payal said:
7 years ago
Yes, NOTA should be given as an option to the voters. Generally, if a person doesn't like any of the people who is a candidate in the election, that person is forced to give a vote against his/her choice and willingness. So, it is a kind of creates pressure on them to vote. So, voting options should be open-ended just like a research questionnaire.
(6)
Aftva said:
10 years ago
Hello, sir.
If we have an option for NOTA, Then it is the shame for us. What happens if 100% voters chose NOTA. Nothing same leader same option again. Its is just wastage of time and money. If we want an option for NOTA then we need to create a rule. If NOTA rate is high then all those leaders of that place are not eligible for leading again.
If we have an option for NOTA, Then it is the shame for us. What happens if 100% voters chose NOTA. Nothing same leader same option again. Its is just wastage of time and money. If we want an option for NOTA then we need to create a rule. If NOTA rate is high then all those leaders of that place are not eligible for leading again.
(50)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers