Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
184 comments Page 11 of 19.
Sahil said:
7 years ago
I think no.
Nota is only waste of the right to vote.
Nota means a doll in the hand of fools.
If in a constituency the no. Of total vote is 100 and 80 people vote for Nota and rest 20 vote are devided in two candidates getting 12 and 8 votes respectively, then the candidate who got 12 votes will win.
It means the total 80 vote get waste.
It's a bad concept. There will be no meaning of democracy in such system.
Nota is only waste of the right to vote.
Nota means a doll in the hand of fools.
If in a constituency the no. Of total vote is 100 and 80 people vote for Nota and rest 20 vote are devided in two candidates getting 12 and 8 votes respectively, then the candidate who got 12 votes will win.
It means the total 80 vote get waste.
It's a bad concept. There will be no meaning of democracy in such system.
(12)
Riya Teepa said:
5 months ago
In my opinion, the NOTA (None of the Above) option should not be included in elections because it diminishes competition among candidates.
For instance, if the difference in votes between the winner and the runner-up is very small, the votes cast for NOTA could have been redirected to another candidate. This would increase the chances of the most deserving or accurate candidate winning the election.
For instance, if the difference in votes between the winner and the runner-up is very small, the votes cast for NOTA could have been redirected to another candidate. This would increase the chances of the most deserving or accurate candidate winning the election.
(1)
Deepika said:
8 years ago
No, voters should not be given NOTA choice, because if everyone go for this choice in votings, then definitely no political party will come in the country. And there will be 99% chance of coming military raj in the country. Also the money wasted on the elections will be of no use. This was started for the benefit of people but I think that this may also go against the benefit of public.
(26)
Dileep kumar said:
9 years ago
NOTA's presence may bring indifference in our democratic country. Because a democracy means people choose their government who can run the state. If none of the leaders are chosen so who will administrate the state?
People of the nation must be indifferent towards their duties if the NOTA is given. I think NOTA may no longer work if citizens are educated and non-corrupted as well.
People of the nation must be indifferent towards their duties if the NOTA is given. I think NOTA may no longer work if citizens are educated and non-corrupted as well.
(5)
Dristi said:
9 years ago
NOTA is a good option because no matter whom we vote there's no change in society. We should spread awareness among people about NOTA. I will wait in queue even I have to vote NOTA even if my 1 NOTA doesn't make a difference because at least I was given a chance to vote what I really want. Mainly because I don't have any politicians in my family so I no need to stick up for one.
(3)
Rohit kumar said:
9 years ago
Hello, friend.
As we know India is a democratic country and every people have their own rights choice so why not in election scenario.
NOTA choice should be there so that people can give msg to election parties that your candidates are not able to uplift our country. It may lead to the selection of better candidates and our country foundation will be strong enough to progress.
As we know India is a democratic country and every people have their own rights choice so why not in election scenario.
NOTA choice should be there so that people can give msg to election parties that your candidates are not able to uplift our country. It may lead to the selection of better candidates and our country foundation will be strong enough to progress.
(12)
Vandana said:
9 years ago
Hi, friends.
I think NOTA is a good option to get transparency in the elections.
And yes I agree using NOTA option there is a waste of money as it will result in re-election but guys this change will lead to another change and forces government to re-think on a policy of election. So every change is good.
We should all support NOTA so that a fear come in every politician.
I think NOTA is a good option to get transparency in the elections.
And yes I agree using NOTA option there is a waste of money as it will result in re-election but guys this change will lead to another change and forces government to re-think on a policy of election. So every change is good.
We should all support NOTA so that a fear come in every politician.
(3)
Sai mahesh vaddi said:
9 years ago
Hello friends,
In my point of view NOTA in soon leads to revolutionary changes in our election field because many educated people are not showing interest on voting just because of criminal politicians are the candidates. NOTA is the best for such a people. So there will be changes of increase in voting percentage if educated people comes forward to use their vote right.
In my point of view NOTA in soon leads to revolutionary changes in our election field because many educated people are not showing interest on voting just because of criminal politicians are the candidates. NOTA is the best for such a people. So there will be changes of increase in voting percentage if educated people comes forward to use their vote right.
(6)
DEEPIKA said:
1 year ago
Hello mates,
Every coin has two sides. NOTA has both pros and cons. NOTA shows the dissatisfaction level of the people.
But, In my point of view, there should not be a NOTA option because the people who don't know NOTA, unknowingly press the NOTA. Because of these activities.
That the election committee should appoint a good elective nominee before the election itself.
Every coin has two sides. NOTA has both pros and cons. NOTA shows the dissatisfaction level of the people.
But, In my point of view, there should not be a NOTA option because the people who don't know NOTA, unknowingly press the NOTA. Because of these activities.
That the election committee should appoint a good elective nominee before the election itself.
(5)
Sam said:
2 years ago
By providing nota as an option to the voters the democracy levels will increase along with the improvement of leadership. This is because, every single vote is important and where the win margin is less than the nota votes, parties will evaluate to get nota votes for their candidates in the next election. Hence candidates will be chosen who have worked at ground level.
(6)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers