Should GD be Part of Campus Placements?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
149 comments Page 15 of 15.
Kartik khatri said:
10 years ago
Hey friends, my name is Kartik, as far as I am concerned group discussion should be a part of an interview because there is a bundle of people who are knocking the door of the panels for limited jobs so it is the only way to panels that separating the cream out from the bunch of aspirants.
(3)
Sunil said:
1 decade ago
HI FRIENDS.
I think conducting gd in campus placements is better but depending upon only gd they should not select the member because the person may not feel well I mean he/she may suffer from throat pain or cold something else but at that time she/he know full topic and can speak but due to the problems they may not at that particular situation. So I think that conducting gd in campus placements is not better.
I think conducting gd in campus placements is better but depending upon only gd they should not select the member because the person may not feel well I mean he/she may suffer from throat pain or cold something else but at that time she/he know full topic and can speak but due to the problems they may not at that particular situation. So I think that conducting gd in campus placements is not better.
(2)
Jayanta said:
1 decade ago
To be Frank That's Not A gd in placement Scenario. In My Entire life I never knew a professional group discussion to be ended with many people shouting. If GDs is what corporate world mean during recruiting process, they should allot some more time.
An Excellent gd comprises of sharing opinions and reaching Conclusions unanimously but in such competitive scenario all norms are broken and is turned to a quarrel. A debate is diff. Than a GD. The Real And appreciative GDs happens within the organisation for considering several points delivered in intellectual way not shouting! So I think GDs should be there but it should be judged by several traits of candidate, not the person eager to dominate or shout with any fallacies.
An Excellent gd comprises of sharing opinions and reaching Conclusions unanimously but in such competitive scenario all norms are broken and is turned to a quarrel. A debate is diff. Than a GD. The Real And appreciative GDs happens within the organisation for considering several points delivered in intellectual way not shouting! So I think GDs should be there but it should be judged by several traits of candidate, not the person eager to dominate or shout with any fallacies.
(2)
Sadhana singh said:
1 decade ago
I think good should remain in campus but it should not be the final decision to consider an applicant's talent and other virtues.
(2)
Minal said:
10 years ago
Hi friends,
I would like to share my opinion on given topic. I agree that if someone who's communication skill is not so good but he is technically strong it may consider as he not right for job, but by GD we can share our thoughts expressively and it shows our team building capabilities. Coin has always two sides, someone take it as positive way and someone take it as negative way.
Thank you,
I would like to share my opinion on given topic. I agree that if someone who's communication skill is not so good but he is technically strong it may consider as he not right for job, but by GD we can share our thoughts expressively and it shows our team building capabilities. Coin has always two sides, someone take it as positive way and someone take it as negative way.
Thank you,
(1)
Rana Rikita said:
9 years ago
GD is better because of that we can know the thoughts and we can know the thinking of the people.
Because of GD people can speak between many people and person can overcome his problem of speaking in between public.
GD is a good process if a company wants to choose the correct candidate because a company can know and check the thinking ability of the candidate.
GD is good if a candidate wants to leave a good impression on company, Interviewer. Company get to know that this person's thinking ability is of which level.
Because of GD people can speak between many people and person can overcome his problem of speaking in between public.
GD is a good process if a company wants to choose the correct candidate because a company can know and check the thinking ability of the candidate.
GD is good if a candidate wants to leave a good impression on company, Interviewer. Company get to know that this person's thinking ability is of which level.
(1)
Vinit kumar said:
2 months ago
Yes, GD is necessary to check the content and the information delivery way of an individual to a group.
(1)
Supriya said:
2 years ago
Group discussion should be part of the campus placement, However, final selection should be based on the cumulative result of all assessments, because if a candidate does well in other selection parameters except GD, it also shows candidate ability.
Shreyash said:
11 months ago
This is kind of my favourite topic I think no in GD sometimes we see a big quarrel happen and judging an individual on 10 minutes or 20 minutes of GD talk is false.
Also in the perspective of the Person who is conducting GD, I think finding the right candidate is the hardest thing so taking a personal interview might it will take 2-3 times taking a personal interview is time-consuming but I think finding the right candidate consumes time is worth instead of taking GD.
Thank You.
Also in the perspective of the Person who is conducting GD, I think finding the right candidate is the hardest thing so taking a personal interview might it will take 2-3 times taking a personal interview is time-consuming but I think finding the right candidate consumes time is worth instead of taking GD.
Thank You.
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers