Retirement Age for Politicians

Hi guys, this is Somya Sharma.

I respect the points of everyone that all of you have given but after listening all of you I wanna say that there should be age limit as many guys said that mostly people loss their health and then they are not so capable to serve the country and by this youth will a get chance to serve the country.

After that I wanna say that if a person is really doing well and if he/she has the capacity to serve the country and if that person is interested so he/she must be given the chance for doing good work.

But if a person in age limit is not doing well then he must be retired because he is not able to do this work.

Many guys said that if old experience and new ideas will be mixed then country will grow rapidly.

Thank you.

Hello, friends!

I beg to differ. An ideal leader should have a lot of knowledge and experience. And experience comes with age. Based on personal experience, I have been treated better by aged doctors than young ones. I feel that is so because of all the experience they possess. The older, the better :D.

Cheers!

According to me, this can develop the country rapidly if we combine the experience of old age and encouragement of new generation politicians.

I think there should be a retirement age limit in politics as the younger generation may come up with newer ideas and thoughts in improving the society and also 90.2% of the population in India are youth the.

Obama's Age = 54.

Pranabji's Age = 80.

By this, I wanna show say youth should also come forward to participate in politics.

Retirement age needs to be 58 as applicable to Government employees.

It can be 68 (2 terms from retirement age) for contesting in Indian politics. They can be an adviser or in any other post in the party, but not a contestant.

"POLITICAL LEADERS ALSO MUST BE RETIRED ON AGE OF 60 YEARS." WHY?

TEN REASONS TO IMPLEMENT:

1. Dynasty system in politics will be automatically stopped.

2. Corruption will be reduced due to detachment of "Power Mania".

3. Employment opportunity will be increased in political background.

4. Pressure will be developed in political parties for keeping deserved quality leaders.

5. Minimum qualification for MPs & MLAs must be graduation.

6. Youth will get a chance to work for the country and will fulfil the present generation need.

7. To keep country always young by reducing generation gap.

8. To build peace and to reduce violent extremism.

9. For common working is between 25 to 60 years, we can say it the main stream of the country. Then why not country should run by mainstream leaders.

10. After retirement, we generally think as bonus life and people need to rest , keep good health, enjoy family life, fulfil personal hobbies and guide their young one (on need basis).

I think there should not be any age limit because as far as politics is concerned skills come with experience and skills lead to the development of the country. If some politician is good enough at their work and able to bring peace and development we should keep promoting him. A retirement in politics is not like that a vacancy has been created just like in some companies and people got recruited in their positions. If young ones want to join then they can open their own parties and show their skills. But if we put an age limit we have to lose some politicians who are exceptionally good at their fields.

I think retirement in politics is a very important factor. If you would not keep any retirement requirement then the aged people will not leave their positions for the young generation. Keeping in mind the future generation is always advanced in thinking and working they may perform very greatly. Giving a hold of power for a long time in one's hand may result in greedy thinking and miss use of politics and even if they have an experience they may use it in their own favor. In politics experience of 20 to years is more than sufficient by my opinion. As you will keep age limit in politics there will naturally be young people with courage and passion as well as aged people having experience. Experienced close to retirement may help young generation in guidance.

Decision made by young people may probably based on detailed information which will lead to proper development. (REQUIREMENT:-for which the young politician should be of proper qualifications).

By proper calculation of different age population in India and its probability, you may fix age limit on that basis where you may have proper age flow in politics with young as well as experienced generation. Thus age limit is essential in politics.

My opinion is that politicians should have no age of retirement because if he/she has the ability to drive a nation effectively with honesty and peace we should support him/her rather asking for his/her age of retirement.

Thank you.

In my point of view, there is a some loss and some benefit by giving the retirement age to positions. If we provide retirement age we lose the great experienced persons. At the same time, we provide the retirement age of chance to participate young and energetic persons. So we provide the retirement age based on talent in solving the problems faced by the country at any time.