Presidential v/s Parliamentary Form of Government in India
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
98 comments Page 9 of 10.
Fesal Fernandes said:
1 decade ago
As in the presidential form of govt , the president is elected on the basis of direact election. It will be an advantage to all indians to chose a leader of their choise. the leader will also be obliged to the people then the other ministers.
(13)
Gargee said:
8 years ago
I support parliamentary form of government because people and the the members of parliament itself can keep a check on the government and each other and full power is not vested in one man's hand as it is harmful and can cause dictatorship.
(28)
Jigyasa chitransh said:
1 decade ago
I feel parliamentary form of government is better as though it takes lots of time to decide on a single issue but if for the right decisions little time is invested then it is totally worthy of it where it is not so in presidential system.
(17)
Dinesh student of kalpna mam said:
1 decade ago
Hello my self Dinesh we are talking about parliamentary vs presidential I thing presidential system in India is better than parliamentary system because my friend you know that our Indians political system is essential for or our country.
(12)
Adnan shahid said:
1 decade ago
I think parliamentary form of government is better as because US which follows presidential form is ranked 19 th most corrupt country while India is ranked 94 th most corrupt. There are many more such examples. Which can prove this fact.
(17)
Kritika said:
1 decade ago
India should have presidential form of government so that it can take quick decisions and perform better in the future. And at the same parliament form of govt is also good because there is choice for the people to choose their leaders.
(26)
Smit shah said:
1 decade ago
Presidential system is a good for India. Because India Parliament system.
All leader are corrupted. One person can take the good decision it is good for India. So this is presidential system better than parliamentary government.
All leader are corrupted. One person can take the good decision it is good for India. So this is presidential system better than parliamentary government.
(21)
Ankur said:
1 decade ago
In USA, being in a presidential form of government, US citizens have never lost their identity. India should immediately switched to presidential form of government if it wants prosperity of the nation as a whole.
(18)
Hemlata Palaria said:
1 decade ago
India should have the parliamentary form of government because in this system, the Government is responsible to the people through their representatives. However, this is not so in Presidential form of Government.
(8)
Harsh said:
9 years ago
I think that parliamentary form of government is better as prevents the prime minister from becoming a dictator. President should always pass the bills according to his opinion along with other people's thought.
(23)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers