Presidential v/s Parliamentary Form of Government in India
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
98 comments Page 8 of 10.
Pooja Upadhyay said:
1 decade ago
I think the present system is also working like Presidential rule or dictatorship. Because during election the most powerful authority of present government Prime minister was presented without following the true and democratic procedure. But here I support parliamentary form of government only.
(21)
Dr. Shivaji Bhise said:
1 decade ago
With the experience of more than 60 years of the parliamentary system, the situation is disappointing in every walk, hence even after considering some demerits of the presidential system, it is superior & should be accepted. It will curb the present chaos & corruption to a large extent.
(16)
Nishith.n said:
8 years ago
Presidential form of government is better. There are many corrupted politicians who eats all the money and does nothing for people. If there is a direct control by president then there would be no corruption. This type of government can help to improve country economically and politically.
(33)
Shubh said:
8 years ago
First of all, I want to say that India is huge population one man can't do all thing if we want development of every region so there should be a representative of that area so in my point of view Parliament is the best way to represent the actual condition of the different area.
(39)
Rishika said:
1 decade ago
For me the person working is more important it hardly matter that he/she is working in a parliamentary or presidential form of government the thing which is important is that he/she is working for the betterment of country or not. Therefore the system is not at all important.
(26)
Archana. singh said:
1 decade ago
According to me parliamentary form is the best form of government. Here everyone has a right to do anything. No person can interface in it. India is one of the most populated country in the world so it is better form to remove the inequalities and poverty against the people.
(17)
Rita said:
9 years ago
I think the presidential form of democracy is the worst way of ruling.
Why should a single person be given all the rights its like practicing inequality within a country?
I even think so that there's no use of saying democratic if a country has this form of democracy.
Why should a single person be given all the rights its like practicing inequality within a country?
I even think so that there's no use of saying democratic if a country has this form of democracy.
(27)
Pritam rajwade said:
1 decade ago
The parliamentary form of government is ideally suited to a democratic set up such as India as against the presidential form adopted by the USA which however according to you is a better form of government. Support your answer with relevant examples and arguments.
(11)
Chandu said:
1 decade ago
According to my point of view, presidential form of India is best because no one can misuse their powers. But only thing is we have to choose best one. Everything is happened by human so they should have to be alert when they are choosing person.
(21)
Jinumm said:
1 decade ago
As in the presidential form of government, the president is elected on the basis of direct election. It will be an advantage to all Indians to chose a leader of their choose. The leader will also be obliged to the people then the other ministers.
(32)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers