Presidential v/s Parliamentary Form of Government in India
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
98 comments Page 10 of 10.
Nishtha said:
9 years ago
I think presidential form of government is better because it fastens up the decision and execution process which ultimately reduces corruption, problems that people face and also ultimately the growth rate.
(26)
Anshula soni said:
1 decade ago
I think parliamentary form of government is more better, as every decision is taken collectively by the representatives of the people belonging to different states.
(17)
Kamna said:
1 decade ago
Its great to have presidential form of government because country needs a dynamic free and fear free leader who can work of his own so presidential would be good.
(39)
Lakshmibhavani said:
1 decade ago
Yes India must have parliamentary form of government. Since India has world's 2nd highest population so, presidential form of government is not suitable.
(13)
Ankita said:
1 decade ago
According to me presidential form of government is best because it avoids the misusing of powers and a country can be run in a better way.
(14)
Anusha said:
1 decade ago
India being a democratic country it should have a parliamentary form of government because here good quality of decisions are made.
(17)
Aastha Tewari said:
1 decade ago
I think in USA we have PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACY as the citizens choose their own leader and the leader has the supreme power.
(17)
Ankit Kapoor said:
9 years ago
I think parliamentary form of government is better.
(18)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers