Indians Perform Better as Individuals than in Groups/Teams

In my point of view India can perform very well as individual and as a group. For example as a group Indian football team, the football team achievement is not the work done alone by Sunil Chhetri. Thus it is the hard work of each player of the team and for the passion they had. On the other hand we have World number one badminton player like Sania Mirza and Olympic bronze medalist like Mary Kom, these two struggle and face many obstacle alone.

But if I had to choose only one I will choose work as a group. Because in times of facing difficult task it is necessary to share our thoughts, ideas, opinions of each and every individual so that we could have a great outcome in order to solve the task in an easy way.

In my point of view India can perform very well as individual and as a group. As a group Indian cricket team, not successful only for M.S Dhoni. There the success is hard work of every player of the team. And many politician are success for the group perform. And Viswanathanand and many more player are success as a individual perform.

I totally agree with the point which are given above and also according to my point of view. Indians are very well balanced people's. They know that how to work as a team or as an Individual. Actually it depends upon the type of work what we are doing working in a team require those people who know that what to do and when to do and how to do?

They have to do a proper planning about each situation and required some backup for any miss happenings. They need to share thoughts and know each other's ability and so on. So the conclusion is that Indians can work on any attachments weather as an individual or as a group.

I think it is difficult to say that who is batter? Individual or group because it depends on person to person. But one thing that we can see easily that there is very few people they are success individually instead of number of successful people work in group.

According to me it depends on the person's ability, if he can cooperate with the team members then he is a good team player or he can be a team player but there are many people who love working individually because they think that they can perform the work according to there own wish no one will poke their nose in it and they also feel that no two persons are identical so there thoughts differ.

So how can they perform in a group if they have been assigned same work and because of this conflict occurs and team performance becomes low as compared to an individual performance.

Hey all, As per my point of view,

If there is good understanding, ability to ignore colleague's mistakes & help each other to improve work ability, supporting nature, helping nature of all team members in team then I think all team member can make a good working team.

Otherwise as I have seen in Indian companies indians are like crabs, they just do leg pullings of their colleagues when they did mistakes, kidding of juniors, I think Indian professional people haven't aware about professional etiquettes.

So, I think individual work is better, you can learn from your mistakes, you will face problems and you know about every work area on which you will work individually. All credits will be your's after completed assigned project.

Hello friends,

In my point of view, when I considered all aspects of development of India I concludes for India working in group is better than the individual. As a team all nations has to help each other and try to increase the development % of their country. Specifically for India I want to say that India could become a better and fast developed country then the others if it contribute effective part.

Now I concludes my part.

I think many answers are biased. Any individual cannot perform without a team. Even if we talk about a football player or a politician or Saniya Mirza or M S Dhoni it is same for everyone. Everyone only performs in a team. Everyone can only give their outcome in a team. Yes, of course, there will be differences which can be cleared after discussing over that. I don't think football player can perform individually if he was been trained by 3 to 5 people who were working in a team. I don't think that M S Dhoni could have performed if he wouldn't go through the training which was given to him by his group of trainers. I think any individual cannot work or succeed alone. If he or she works in the group then only he or she can succeed and make many more successful people in future.

Well, it depends. Some people perform better when they work alone and some people are more comfortable in teams and groups. Both has its own pros and cons. I would say that working in teams are good when it comes to projects, startups, group activities. The ideas and performance of the entire team is pooled in together to create something beautiful. But this doesn't hold good when it comes to heading an industry or business. I personally do not believe in partnership when it comes to business. This is because, during the course of time, their ideas might change. This causes friction and it might even lead to liquidating the company (assets and shares). Therefore its always better for an individual to head a company or a business and team of managers to work under him/her for the an industry to perform well.

When we talk about Indians performance we always remember the lacklustre performance in recent Olympics. However our girls in individual events made our pride, but the team game didn't live to our expectations.

It is not so that Indians do not perform well in teams or in groups, for example, look our Indian cricket team (men's and women) they are always ahead of others, but the undue pressure on them by our crowd makes them desperate to perform well. Our Indian hockey team is also a feather in a bird.