India should go for the presidential form of democracy
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
107 comments Page 9 of 11.
Manish said:
9 years ago
I don't think India should go for a presidential form because you can't leave a country with full of diversity in languages, castes, religions in one hand. Since it's not necessarily being a safe hand. But obviously, some major changes must be seen in our political system. As everything in the world changes according to time. During independence, our great leaders make some rule according to that scenario that is 100% correct, but we should think of yourself with time and changes.
(16)
Divya said:
9 years ago
Yes, India should go for presidential elections.
1) A right person should be put to power and it will help the actions to be implemented quickly. Parliamentary form consumes a lot of time.
2) If a developed country like the USA can progress further with the power concentrated in a single hand then why not ours.
3) Today the major problem in India is the formation of a coalition government. With no party in the absolute majority, no decision can be implemented as there is constant opposition from the other.
1) A right person should be put to power and it will help the actions to be implemented quickly. Parliamentary form consumes a lot of time.
2) If a developed country like the USA can progress further with the power concentrated in a single hand then why not ours.
3) Today the major problem in India is the formation of a coalition government. With no party in the absolute majority, no decision can be implemented as there is constant opposition from the other.
(15)
Neha said:
9 years ago
No, India should not go for presidential elections.
1) India is a vast country with diverse culture. It is necessary for the people from different groups to come together and form a government so that the wishes of the minority doesn't get suppressed.
2) An opposition is necessary to get the right decision implemented which is acceptable to all.
1) India is a vast country with diverse culture. It is necessary for the people from different groups to come together and form a government so that the wishes of the minority doesn't get suppressed.
2) An opposition is necessary to get the right decision implemented which is acceptable to all.
(29)
Pranshu Mishra said:
9 years ago
Yes, it should be because the Presidential System will reforms stable government for a long term, and while taking decision its consume less time as well as the majority will be supported.
Because of Democracy, taking a decision it takes too many thoughts and reviews. It's right but decision are taken only for parties faith, not for the nation.
So, parties should be demolished and one party one rule should be established.
Because of Democracy, taking a decision it takes too many thoughts and reviews. It's right but decision are taken only for parties faith, not for the nation.
So, parties should be demolished and one party one rule should be established.
(24)
Saurav Prabhat said:
9 years ago
Yes, I do think that there should be a presedential form of government in India but at the same time, it is equally important that the man in power should be honest enough towards his works and decisions.
If it would be like that then I strongly believe that India will soon become a developed country. . Anyways, better than a developing country at least. The decision taken by a single mind by a good thinking and without any oppositions is always better.
If it would be like that then I strongly believe that India will soon become a developed country. . Anyways, better than a developing country at least. The decision taken by a single mind by a good thinking and without any oppositions is always better.
(10)
Somashekar Rao G said:
9 years ago
Though India being a vast country with diverse cultures it's the people & region along with faith & self-conscious of people, race, gender & what not. It's all been reflected day in day out of our news channels.
So Presidential rule keeping the time & action is the need of hour than beating around the bush like a vast country with diverse cultures etc.
So Presidential rule keeping the time & action is the need of hour than beating around the bush like a vast country with diverse cultures etc.
(8)
Siddharth said:
9 years ago
Hello, everyone.
You all have put your valuable points and I agree to that but I would like to add some key points to it.
Changing from democracy to presidential government is a good idea but with a condition that the person who is chosen as the leader should have some education qualification and can withstand any situation he faces with proper decision-making qualities.
You all have put your valuable points and I agree to that but I would like to add some key points to it.
Changing from democracy to presidential government is a good idea but with a condition that the person who is chosen as the leader should have some education qualification and can withstand any situation he faces with proper decision-making qualities.
(23)
Yogesh said:
9 years ago
Well, I think in India there are lots of crime, to control crime and implemented rules strictly, there must be a presidential government. You see in our country women not safe when anyone girl gets outside of her house, she is never safe on the way someone rapped with her and when that girl goes to the police station then to write complain, they get lots of time.
There are many things in India which seem that India must be.
Presidential government and about policies its must be change.
There are many things in India which seem that India must be.
Presidential government and about policies its must be change.
(12)
Nayeem said:
9 years ago
I am respecting all of your views on whether India goes through presidential rule or not. I like the presidential rule but I can't expect more than a democratic rule. Presidential policies are most effective over crimes but do not function well. Take the example of America, crimes are going on faster than in India though yet it has the presidential policy. Crimes never can be stopped but we can tackle, thus, we should focus on the person who should have powers.
Thanks.
Thanks.
(15)
Satya said:
9 years ago
The form of government is not the case here. The problem is our politicians. It doesn't require educational or a character to b a leader here but muscle power and money. So when you don't have the good list of politicians, any form of government would be showing the same results as of now. What requires the most is literacy. Unless people don't understand their rights no form of government would be successful here.
Thanks.
Thanks.
(14)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers