Globalization vs. Nationalism
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
135 comments Page 7 of 14.
RAM said:
1 decade ago
Globalization is very necessary for a developing country to improve their economy. But I am not said that nationalism is not important first of all we start from nationalism than after see the popularity in national market than go to globalization. So both factors are important.
(50)
J asthana said:
1 decade ago
Globalization is a major hindrance in the way of nationalism. Globalization is spread of values ideas and tools and technology irrespective of territory and space, whereas the process of national building through the ideas and feeling of of nationalism requires nativism and attachment with the native land and native people. (for more read my article on GLOBALIZATION DECULTURATION AND NATIONALISM).
(11)
Nitin patidar said:
1 decade ago
In my point of view globalization is best option for developing country because we need to so many new technology and new ideas so we can afford that things through globalization without globalization we can't compare to our nation growth to other nation we don't know about other technology or other new way so we should be support globalization.
Than you.
Than you.
(8)
Gautam said:
1 decade ago
In my point of view the globalisation and nationalism goes hand-in-hand. The famous quote "The charity begins at Home" is a worthful quote. Today in the present scenario where the we are globally connected with each other, the global responsibilities have increased if we are major country of the world, but still nationalism cannot be overlooked first country then world then only we can be successful.
(29)
Kannan said:
1 decade ago
Globalization means exchange the ideas with other country of the world. It help us a lot because India still developing.
According to me globalization is necessary for us because it help us to understand different techniques and education system.
According to me globalization is necessary for us because it help us to understand different techniques and education system.
(21)
Meihuan said:
1 decade ago
Globalization and Nationalization are two very different terms. Globalization refers to assimilation of the best technology, economic pattern, defense, education, etc. Whereas nationalism symbolizes closeness or adherence to ones own values and culture which includes social, economic, political etc.
In the past due to less or no globalization countries development were stagnated or slowed, those were the days when nationalism was dominant. But at present we are convinced that if it was not for globalization we might have been still ignorant and poor and development a far dream.
Having said that to reap the fruits of globalization we have to create a favorable national environment. In short. We need a good blend between globalization and nationalism.
In the past due to less or no globalization countries development were stagnated or slowed, those were the days when nationalism was dominant. But at present we are convinced that if it was not for globalization we might have been still ignorant and poor and development a far dream.
Having said that to reap the fruits of globalization we have to create a favorable national environment. In short. We need a good blend between globalization and nationalism.
(21)
Sean said:
1 decade ago
Globalization is the product of multinational corporations greed, exploiting and ravaging poor nations for corporate profit. Multinational corporations from the US have the US govt in their pockets. They rob US jobs with overseas slave wage workers and create dependence on other countries, like the mideast for oil and china for our cheap trinkets. Id be glad to pay a little more for oil and parts and trinkets and stuff to keep jobs in the US. The US through globalization brought on by multinational corporations, most based right here in the US have depleted the independence of the US.
In roman times, all roads led to Rome. The wealth of the roman empire flowed from the rest of the world into Rome. When history looks back, The US empire will be the only one in history to have created such massive wealth and gave it away to the rest of the world who still hated them for it.
In my opinion countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt or any other country for that matter do not appreciate our help our intervention, our wars, our democracy, our aid or anything about the US.
Globalization might be good for some countries, but it is bringing down the US. Time for nationalistic policies keeping jobs and a good economy at home before we spread the wealth to the rest of the world.
In roman times, all roads led to Rome. The wealth of the roman empire flowed from the rest of the world into Rome. When history looks back, The US empire will be the only one in history to have created such massive wealth and gave it away to the rest of the world who still hated them for it.
In my opinion countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt or any other country for that matter do not appreciate our help our intervention, our wars, our democracy, our aid or anything about the US.
Globalization might be good for some countries, but it is bringing down the US. Time for nationalistic policies keeping jobs and a good economy at home before we spread the wealth to the rest of the world.
(8)
Ashish said:
1 decade ago
Hello Friends,
Globalization and Nationalism both are equally important for any country to have an eminent stand in the world market. As globalization gives a better way of sharing ideas, technology and knowledge in the current market situation resulting in emerging out better solutions but it should be done in such a way so that it must hinder the ethics of nationalism.
Globalization and Nationalism both are equally important for any country to have an eminent stand in the world market. As globalization gives a better way of sharing ideas, technology and knowledge in the current market situation resulting in emerging out better solutions but it should be done in such a way so that it must hinder the ethics of nationalism.
(27)
Pranav said:
1 decade ago
Globalization and Nationalization can co-exist, but only to the point when globalization is not confused with Westernization. Post-Independence, we Indians, have had strong infatuations with western traditions and way of life. To globalize does not necessarily mean to adhere to a different philosophy and abandoning our entire belief system. Different countries can co-operate peacefully on economic as well as other platforms without infringing upon the Nationalistic ideologies of another nations.
I would like to add an important historical point here. Back in the day, our country was proud to have Universities like Taxila and Nalanda where students from all over the world came and gained knowledge in various disciplines. The medium of language was partly alien to the foreign students. Still they came and studied. After all, it was the education that mattered and not the language.
It is one of the few examples where we managed to globalize tremendously keeping the nationalistic tendencies alive. There was a huge influx of foreign students at that time. Currently we do have "world class" management institutes but they do not have the same amount of foreign influx. We certainly have globalized a lot post-independence, but that globalization has come at the cost of Nationalism.
And this is what we need to keep in mind. For a country having tremendous cultural heritage, nationalistic ideologies are an intrinsic part of getting Globalized. If we continue on the current trend.
I would like to add an important historical point here. Back in the day, our country was proud to have Universities like Taxila and Nalanda where students from all over the world came and gained knowledge in various disciplines. The medium of language was partly alien to the foreign students. Still they came and studied. After all, it was the education that mattered and not the language.
It is one of the few examples where we managed to globalize tremendously keeping the nationalistic tendencies alive. There was a huge influx of foreign students at that time. Currently we do have "world class" management institutes but they do not have the same amount of foreign influx. We certainly have globalized a lot post-independence, but that globalization has come at the cost of Nationalism.
And this is what we need to keep in mind. For a country having tremendous cultural heritage, nationalistic ideologies are an intrinsic part of getting Globalized. If we continue on the current trend.
(56)
SALMAN said:
1 decade ago
I believe we are leaving in a planet where every one of us are so matured that what is right or wrong. I think that there should not be any kind of inhumanity among the national and globalization and the most important tag the globalization should not forgot that, the implementations, upgrade, superiority of the globalization is all by the efforts of nationalism. As of the current view of the society it has become such away that the products used by one country are bought to the other country and get to be sold which makes that particular country currency down and down. I THINK IF THIS ISSUE HAS A SOLUTION, THERE WILL BE MANY COUNTRIES LIKE CHINA, NOT THE ONE.
(11)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers