Globalization vs. Nationalism

Let me ask you a simple question, "If Nationalism is more important than globalization, then why do you think thousands of children go to foreign countries for studying?I agree with you in that nation gives us a identity and culture. But that doesn't mean we have to be restricted to our nation, we have to open our doors to the world.

Have you heard about the rapid growth in the economy of China, It was only because it gave thousands of oppurtunities to foreign investors, but in a controlled manner. Now we can see it as a flourishing economy. So globaliztion is very important in terms that we have to learn and grow.

In my opinion nationalisation is more important. Hadn't India been among top in the list of corrupt countries, it would have been among the richest economies. The government of India still has loads of money for education and eliminating poverty, and employing the unemployed. We can see japan as among the richest economies as it emphasises on natoinalisation rather than capitalisation.

It is not agreeable that globalisation is important for gaining new expirences and technologies and ideas, because its most of the indians working abroad who study from India but due to lack of good opportunity, go to abroad and develop technologies there which are then imported by India at a high cost. With nationalisation, these people will remain here only and thus contribute in the development of our country. I think we can be known better if we are nationalised and have a good economy ratHer than being globalised and having a poor economy. With nationalisation opportunities in every feild will increase.

Though nationalisation grounds us to our roots, but we should always remember that the secret of our country's past lay in its ever accepting society. We destroyed ourself only by giving up the same openess. Culture itself is an ever changing entity. So, we need not fear of becoming very stubborn or reservred in terms of culture with nationalisation.

In my point of view globlisation is good, if it reduce the poverty of our country, if it able to feed more people. Providing every essential things to live. But somtimes it is found that globlisation doesnt fullfil this. So globlisation is good if is done for welfare of common people, and nationalism is must in our country becouse it provid jobs and make us independent.

Globalization vs Nationalism, Yes globalization very important in current scenario not just in India but to the whole world. Today each human being is connected to globalization through different sources. For Underdeveloped countries like India, it is very important to be connected with rest of the world for the purpose of business, finance, communication, cultural exchanges, Tourism etc. All these things are possible only because of globalization.

Hi let me tell you what is globalisation. In real it is the process of connecting of national economies through a common platform like trade, FDI etc. In my sense globalisation is much needed for any developing country to increse its GDP, for creating employement. In the early decades after the independence, Indian was likwe a iron kukoon with no exports to the other countries and also no imports and hence the GDP was also very low up to early 1980's. But after 1980's because of globalisation only the GDP of the country has started increasing. However some people says that because of globalisation only our culture is disappearing because of globalisation but I think it is the not only factor which is downgarading the Indian culture. So, globalisation is necessary in terms of everything, if globalisation is not there, we will just remain in our country all, to spread our talents in term of anything may be its business or anything else. Globalisation is required.