EQ or IQ

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
263 comments Page 27 of 27.

Novaraj said:   1 month ago
Hello everyone.

I am Novaraj.

My thinking is that IQ and EQ are very important things in a human being, for example, IQ is only knowledge, skill and talent.

We can live in the world without knowledge at all times, so we need EQ also, for example, to control mental and physical emotions and to maintain good relations with anyone. So, IQ and EQ are very important things in the world to be balanced equally.
(1)

Bisweswar said:   6 months ago
On my perspective both IQ and EQ are more important to reach to success.

We can't avoid one of them, if we only stay with IQ, more IQ person able to solve the analytical problem, logical problem, and academic skill but it can be increase by practice.

Whereas EQ is more important to understand emotion, leadership quality comes from the EQ.

That's why we can't say ONE of them are important.

Rosie Rai said:   2 weeks ago
Both EQ and IQ have equal significance, but it matters in context. A scientist or researcher working for innovations and technology should have a dominant IQ rather than EQ, and similarly, Humanitarians, Teachers, Policemen, and any other field function properly with balanced EQ & IQ.

By no means, I said scientists and innovators must only have high IQ, lack of EQ could lead to destruction of humanity and lives, while the core intention is promotion and helping lives and whole prosperity.


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.