Capital Punishment should be Banned or Allowed?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
233 comments Page 8 of 24.
Chaudhary said:
4 years ago
There are a lot of ethical dilemmas involved in capital punishment. In most of the cases, death penalty can be avoided. Life imprisonment is the best alternative for the capital punishment. By imposing life imprisonment, we can reform the person. Even if he is not.
Reformed, life imprisonment can act as a severe punishment and also as a deterrent.
However, the criminals, who do heinous crimes and are incapable of being reformed must be given death penalty, because they don't deserve to live, not even in prison.
Reformed, life imprisonment can act as a severe punishment and also as a deterrent.
However, the criminals, who do heinous crimes and are incapable of being reformed must be given death penalty, because they don't deserve to live, not even in prison.
(12)
Chenna keshavulu said:
7 years ago
Hi friends.
When we talk about capital punishment it has both pros and cons.
For example, if we allow CP the others may say it is a violation of FR (rt to life). Otherwise, if we abolish it there is no chance to curb the criminals further it leads to increase of crimes and violence against innocent and moreover they also criticise the government.
So, what I mean to say is "cp should allow according to the intensity of crime". As it is better when compared to allowing and abolishing cp completely.
Thank you.
When we talk about capital punishment it has both pros and cons.
For example, if we allow CP the others may say it is a violation of FR (rt to life). Otherwise, if we abolish it there is no chance to curb the criminals further it leads to increase of crimes and violence against innocent and moreover they also criticise the government.
So, what I mean to say is "cp should allow according to the intensity of crime". As it is better when compared to allowing and abolishing cp completely.
Thank you.
(42)
Neha kumari said:
7 years ago
Penality death should be banned because this is not right decision, punishment means an extreme heart pain which result to relalised the mistake of that particular person but in penality death it becomes the end of life of that person, so this is not good. In our contribution there is freedom law to right to live but in penality death it brokes the law which is illegal in our law but penality death is. Ilegal why? And there is also the fact that if we have to right to born then why I have the right to death?
(22)
SUJIT SINGH said:
8 years ago
Hello everyone, I am Sujit. I want to speak something on this topic. CP shouldn't be banned because justice won't be achieved by the death penalty. It is a good rule by this rule no one ll go for crimes and murder etc. If there won't any punishment then many people ll involve with crime and then the percent of criminal ll increase. Not giving them the punishment they deserve ll encourage others to be a criminal. If something is making good to other peoples then it isn't bad to a thing like this.
Thanks.
Thanks.
(39)
Udit ksrki said:
10 years ago
According to me capital punishment is must in our country because the person who rapes who murder are the person who don't follow the fundamental.
Rights of our country if we give them severe punishment then they will free after some years and they try to take the revenge which leads against rape and murder and also terrorist who get caught in our country. If our country don't give them capital punishment then they will thought easy. So as per my opinion capital punishment must be there in our country.
Rights of our country if we give them severe punishment then they will free after some years and they try to take the revenge which leads against rape and murder and also terrorist who get caught in our country. If our country don't give them capital punishment then they will thought easy. So as per my opinion capital punishment must be there in our country.
(14)
MIKE Kaushal said:
8 years ago
We can stop rape in India, there is only one-way Indian parliament should give permission for brothels in India. Then I am 1000% sure innocent girls will not become a victim, Even boys will stop looking the girl, Even stop talk with girls. All boys will think there are only 1000 rupees for go to a brothel. Then there is no any boy who will take the risk to do rape of the innocent girl. If the government allow the licenced brothels in India. Then there will no any rape happen with the innocent girls.
(35)
Prince gupta said:
9 years ago
Capital punishment is a right way to reduce the terrorism as well as crime if the government take the decision for imprisonment to terrorist and rapist. Then it will be increase the cost of government. Thus for reducing the rape case or terrorism.
The government should take the decision of capital punishment against rapist as well as terrorism. At last, I will say that if capital punishment will give to terrorist then terrorist will think thousand times before committing any terrorist activities.
The government should take the decision of capital punishment against rapist as well as terrorism. At last, I will say that if capital punishment will give to terrorist then terrorist will think thousand times before committing any terrorist activities.
(26)
Forever Anonymous. said:
9 years ago
This is a confusing question for me. I'm in favor of CP but then, there is one question that boggles me all the time. We all know that criminals commit a crime only when their mind is unsound and are anxious and not in a right state of mind. They do know it's wrong. But they can't control their emotions. Certainly, they must be having a fear of death but if they overcome it, it surely means their will to kill is greater than the fear of death. So How does killing criminals work to reduce crimes?
(14)
Zeeshan said:
8 years ago
What kind of double standard is that most of the people say that Capital punishment is barbaric and it should be banned. But for eg suppose if someone rapes your sister and you are the judge what punishment would you give to the culprit? 1000% people will say we'll give him death punishment, many will say I will kill people ruthlessly. But if one rapes someone's sister then you say, no capital punishment should be banned so why it's a double standard, Law should be same for all. Isn't it?
(42)
Sandeep Jangid said:
8 years ago
If the absence of adequate data on the subject, taking into consideration all cases, background of these soldiers, their known problems, age group, marital status, financial state, details of their past ten years tenures, detection of signs of depression and methods employed for the purpose and once signs of depression are observed, steps taken to seek expert help etc, no worthwhile examination of the problem is feasible.
Indian army has an enviable record spread over two cents.
Indian army has an enviable record spread over two cents.
(13)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers