Capital Punishment should be Banned or Allowed?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
233 comments Page 1 of 24.
Charu khare said:
1 decade ago
I think so capital punishment should be given in Indian context because its very necessary for those criminals who think that they can do crime freely and no one says or told anything to him and even not judiciary also see every crime his its a different level so we have to make a fear of punishment in their minds and according to theirs crimes judiciary take any action against to them.
(13)
Pratyasha swain said:
1 decade ago
Capital punishment should be given to the rarest of the rare crime. In a democratic country like India people should have the right to life. And while punishing we should think of the right of innocent people in general, not of the accused who did the heinous crime.
(9)
Anonymous said:
1 decade ago
I don't think that the persons who commit such crimes are human beings. So I don't the should have any human rights. Death penalty should never be abolished because abolishing of death penalty will create an thinking of injustice for the victims of the crime.
But whomever it is given there should be an proper evidence of the crime.
But whomever it is given there should be an proper evidence of the crime.
(22)
Arjunpat said:
1 decade ago
People say capital punishment should not given then fine the offender should tortured based on the crime and should be made to suffer, but of purse it is kinder to kill him so why are people against justice, are they against punishment of the offender because that is ridiculous.
(16)
Sonam kumar yadav said:
1 decade ago
Friend have you ever read a newspaper article from a girl's point of view today India is crime capital jail's are full of criminals India in my point of view requires capital punishment. There are pro's and con's.
There should have a fear of death in one's mind which could resist them from committing crime. This should be continued till crime rates are in controls, till the last justices is delivered to the family's of victim.
There should have a fear of death in one's mind which could resist them from committing crime. This should be continued till crime rates are in controls, till the last justices is delivered to the family's of victim.
(20)
Prashant said:
1 decade ago
Capital punishment should not be banned in India but it should be more specified and more descriptive so that any innocent person not get punished by this as per my opinion CP should be more worst than hanging people because it is easiest way of dead and terrorist who kills thousands of people and by taking only one life of him or her is not Justice to all those who are killed by them.
(23)
Urja said:
1 decade ago
In my opinion death penalty should be there in India so that one would think a thousand time before doing so or becoming a criminal.
(23)
Anwesha said:
1 decade ago
According to me capital punishment should not be abolished. If there is capital punishment, criminals will have fear factor in their minds. The terrorists and rapist should not be allowed to roam freely in the society. Rapists should be hanged in front of the public so that everyone will come to know that girls are not sex toys.
(34)
Diva said:
1 decade ago
This whole death penalty thing makes no sense. It's like the government will kill the prisoner for killing a person.
How does this make the government any different from the killer. You are killing a person for killing a person. Then aren't you committing the same crime?what lesson are you giving to the prisoner that you'll die and even if he regrets it, what can he do? It's too late to change anything.
You should allow him to live under the supervision of people so if he does a crime again he would be imprisoned for life. Why don't we start by using words instead of guns. "death penalty is a murder".
How does this make the government any different from the killer. You are killing a person for killing a person. Then aren't you committing the same crime?what lesson are you giving to the prisoner that you'll die and even if he regrets it, what can he do? It's too late to change anything.
You should allow him to live under the supervision of people so if he does a crime again he would be imprisoned for life. Why don't we start by using words instead of guns. "death penalty is a murder".
(29)
Ribor Kharsynniang said:
1 decade ago
Because being a democratic country like India, everyone have the right to live, therefore Capital Punishment is not fully applicable. But, if Capital Punishment is often applicable also, the criminal will kill the victim. For Eg. A rapist will kill a girl because he know if he let the girl live he will be sentence to death.
Abolition and promotion of Capital punishment is already a controversial in the first ground. How about leaving the decision to the victim or victim's family whether to let the person live or not, or harm the reproductive organ, if in the rape case?
Abolition and promotion of Capital punishment is already a controversial in the first ground. How about leaving the decision to the victim or victim's family whether to let the person live or not, or harm the reproductive organ, if in the rape case?
(11)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers