# Data Interpretation - Pie Charts - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Pie Charts - Pie Chart 4 (Q.No. 1)
Directions to Solve

The pie chart shows the distribution of New York market share by value of different computer companies in 2005.

The pie chart shows the distribution of New York market share by volume of different computer companies in 2005.

Number of units sold in 2005 in New York = 1,500

Value of units sold in 2005 in New York = US \$1,650,000.

1.
For the year 2005, which company has realised the lowest average unit sales price for a PC ?
Commodore
IBM
Tandy
Cannot be determined
Explanation:
Although it seems to be Commodore, the answer cannot be determined due to the fact that we are unaware of the break-up of the sales value and volume of companies compromising the other categories.
Discussion:
28 comments Page 1 of 3.

SIA said:   2 years ago
What's meant by "value", isn't value the price amount, like a monetary valuation of the companies? Anyone explain me.

Sanket sharma said:   3 years ago
The procedure for finding a single unit sales value is to VALUE by VOLUME.

But as another section is unknown (it can be anything) we might have the lowest value from any of those companies hence commodore can't be concluded as the lowest.

Yuki said:   3 years ago

Satya Jeet Verma said:   3 years ago
Here we can not determine because we only know how many units are sold but don't know at what price it is sold because here cumulative price is given but individual company laptop price is not given.
(1)

Kishor said:   4 years ago

Shubhankar singh bhadouriya said:   4 years ago
Yes, the answer can easily determine because it was given there in percentage (8%...).
We only have found out 8% of the total price amount.

NIRANJAN said:   5 years ago

Because if we calculate for IBM PC in average unit sale price in question 3 of this section, which answer is \$3080 per unit.

Same is for all, where we found that lowest is Commodore (\$259 per unit).

Nicolus said:   6 years ago
At first, I went to Commodore, but once, reading Varun comment, I got it. Just tricky with the word "others".

Supratik said:   6 years ago
I agree with @Shital.

Because in order to calculate anything so precise such as lowest average unit, we need to have full information about the entire set, which, in this case, do not have.

Raj said:   6 years ago