Aptitude - Compound Interest - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Compound Interest - General Questions (Q.No. 8)
8.
The least number of complete years in which a sum of money put out at 20% compound interest will be more than doubled is:
3
4
5
6
Answer: Option
Explanation:

P 1 + 20 n > 2P         6 n > 2.
100 5

Now, 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 > 2.
5 5 5 5

So, n = 4 years.

Discussion:
26 comments Page 1 of 3.

Abinash said:   2 decades ago
Dear friends, Can anybody tell me in brief how it is done please?

Sohi said:   1 decade ago
Let x=(6/5)^n

(6/5)^n >2....................(1)

if we put value of n=1 then x=1.2.........condtion 1 is false.


if we put value of n=2 then x=1.44.........condtion 1 is still false.


if we put value of n=3 then x=1.728.........condtion 1 is false.

if we put value of n=4 then x=2.07.........now condtion 1 is true.


Hence answer is 4.

Thanx.

Kannan said:   1 decade ago
Hi friends,

In the explanation, in 1st step p is present.

But in 2nd step it is vanished where it is gone ?

Kailash said:   1 decade ago
Hello Kannan,
It got cancel (by dividing both side by P).

Sharvari said:   1 decade ago
Can someone explain in easier way?
Please.

Lakshmanan sp said:   1 decade ago
AS p(6/5)^n>2p.

Next step (6/5)^n>2.

Next step ,take n = 1, then 6/5 = 1.2 therefore (1.2)^1 = 1.2.

|||rly for n = 2(1.2)^2 = 1.44.

For n = 3(1.2)^3 = 1.44*1.2 = 1.7288.

For n = 4(1.2)^4 = 1.7288*1.2 = 2.07.

Hence minimum no.of years is 4.

Jahnavi said:   1 decade ago
Guys can you pls explain what is the first formula we are using there:
i.e., p(1 + 20/100)^n > 2p.
what is actually?

Narayana Rao Gartam said:   1 decade ago
Dear Jahnavi,

Amount = P(1+R/100)^n.
Sum of money is more than the double of Amount.

So, 2P < P(1+20/100)^n , Since R= 20%
P and P cancelled each other. So,
2< (1+20/100)^n.
2< (120/100)^n.
2<(6/5)^n.

Try n=1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
What least number can satisfy the 2<(6/5)^n.

Lets n=1 ( 2<1.2 so, wrong).
Lets n=2 ( 2<1.44 so, wrong).
Lets n=3 ( 2<1.728 so, wrong).
Lets n=4 ( 2<2.1036 so, right).

Answer is 4 years.
(1)

Swathi said:   1 decade ago
Hi,

We are using > 2. Can you explain it?

Anjali said:   10 years ago
I am unable to understand why are taking amount formula in place of CI. Please explain it.


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.