Aptitude - Compound Interest - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Compound Interest - General Questions (Q.No. 1)
1.
A bank offers 5% compound interest calculated on half-yearly basis. A customer deposits Rs. 1600 each on 1st January and 1st July of a year. At the end of the year, the amount he would have gained by way of interest is:
Rs. 120
Rs. 121
Rs. 122
Rs. 123
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Amount
= Rs. 1600 x 1 + 5 2 + 1600 x 1 + 5
2 x 100 2 x 100
= Rs. 1600 x 41 x 41 + 1600 x 41
40 40 40
= Rs. 1600 x 41 41 + 1
40 40
= Rs. 1600 x 41 x 81
40 x 40
= Rs. 3321.

C.I. = Rs. (3321 - 3200) = Rs. 121

Discussion:
220 comments Page 12 of 22.

Vasavi said:   1 decade ago
As it is half yearly basis,

The formula is A=p[1+(R/2)/100]^2(n).

But here only time varies i.e n=1y & n=1/2y.

Now substitute.

Stupid said:   7 years ago
@All.

In compound interest annually the formula is P(1+R/100)^n. But for half-yearly, it is P[1+2R/100)^2n substitute the values.

Kush said:   8 years ago
We use compound interest formula of half-year because the interest rate imposing on 1600 deposited on 1 Jan was only for 6 months.

Vivek Kumar said:   1 decade ago
Can someone tell me why have they considered 1600 value for the next 6 months (P) should be 1600 + Interest for the next half.

Expert said:   1 decade ago
1st half 1600. After half half yr @2.5% 40 so total 1640.

2nd half 1640+1600 = 3240 so after 1yr 3321.

Gain 3321-3200 = 121.

Donalika said:   10 years ago
Easy way to do it quite clearly.

Double the amount of 1600 = 1600+1600 = 3200.

Is this way is correct? I think its correct.

Pooja said:   1 decade ago
@Amit: Thanks a lot you made me understand the concept. It took me whole day to ponder over the 2nd half of the expression.

Arpita Mandal said:   9 years ago
Why the amount of first six months is not included with 1600 as principal while calculating the amount of next six months?

Purnika said:   1 decade ago
Why we are supposed to add the compound interest for half year and one year to get the amount and why C.I. = (3321-3200)?

Namrata said:   8 years ago
Why we are using half yearly formula in the first case taking n=1/2, and in the 2nd case taking n=1 but keeping R as R/2?


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.