Verbal Reasoning - Syllogism - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Syllogism - Syllogism 2 (Q.No. 1)
Directions to Solve
In each of the following questions two statements are given. Which are followed by four conclusions (1), (2), (3) and (4). Choose the conclusions which logically follow from the given statements.
1.
Statements: No door is dog. All the dogs are cats.
Conclusions:
- No door is cat.
- No cat is door.
- Some cats are dogs.
- All the cats are dogs.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Discussion:
121 comments Page 1 of 13.
Monika said:
1 decade ago
First option: no door is a cat.
It means no door is a cat nor no cat is a door, and this is correct. So why not option 1 and 2 along with option 3?
It means no door is a cat nor no cat is a door, and this is correct. So why not option 1 and 2 along with option 3?
Dinesh said:
1 decade ago
Yes Monika is correct..
Megha said:
1 decade ago
Ya i'm also with you Monika there should be involvement of option 1 & 2 with opt 3.
Mahesh said:
1 decade ago
Ya I also think the answer should be 1, 2&3 follow.
Rajendet said:
1 decade ago
Yes I also agree but it can be explained in more simpler way.
Datchayani said:
1 decade ago
How to choose this conclusion by AEIO method ?
Karthik said:
1 decade ago
Give me correct answer for this question.
Bhrigu raj said:
1 decade ago
First 3 conclusions are right according to me.
Sakshi chopra said:
1 decade ago
According to me 1, 2 are correct, the 3 one doesn't stand as the dogs are cats but not a dog. Its not viceversa.
Divya reddy said:
1 decade ago
I agree with monika. Options are 1, 2 and 3.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers