Verbal Reasoning - Analogy - Discussion

For - Corden : zrogbq.

We move backwards 3 times to get Z, move forward 3 times to get R, backwards 3 times to get O, forward 3 times to get G, backwards 3 times to get B and forwards 3 times to get Q.(So, -3, +3, -3, +3, -3, +3).

Now, for - ? : pxivro,
We should do the opposite i.e +3, -3, +3, -3, +3, -3. Because here we have to find out the first word, not the second. Whereas for Corden : zrogbq we were doing it to find out the second word.

Hence, the correct option is (B) - sulsul

I can't understand this problem.

Solving for Corden : zrogbq.

The move backwards 3 time to get Z, move forward 3 times to get R, backwards 3 times to get O, forward 3times to get G and so on,

Following the same partner, pxivro: mafyor. However, this answer is not in the option.

Please anyone clarify this.

Not understanding, anyone can explain in a simple way?

Right logic is +3, -3, +3, -3, +3, -3.

Here C-3=z, o+3=r, r-3=o similarly add +3 and -3 alternatively. We will get the answer is an option (A).

Here; C-3 = z same way p-3 should be M.

Why we are doing only with 3? why not other numbers?

It should be z+3 = c.

Not getting this. Can anyone explain it clearly?