Discussion :: Spotting Errors - Section 1 (Q.No.154)
Read each sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical error in it. The error, if any will be in one part of the sentence. The letter of that part is the answer. If there is no error, the answer is 'D'. (Ignore the errors of punctuation, if any).
(solve as per the direction given above)
Answer: Option C
that he had involved in the cruel murder of his wife.
|Sheetal said: (May 27, 2011)|
|Can't it be "that he had involvement in the cruel murder of his wife."? Any suggestions?|
|Maddy said: (Jul 8, 2011)|
|Rito sheetal. But is it grammatical error?|
|Lucky said: (Nov 11, 2011)|
|Had involved means past perfect according to the sentence.|
|Edwin said: (Jun 28, 2012)|
|Doesn't the both sentence mean the same? he had hand is nothing but he had involved isn't it?|
|Keerthi said: (Aug 27, 2012)|
|I do agree with edwin. Can anyone explain what is the difference?|
|Rajnish said: (Sep 17, 2012)|
|I dont agree with answer here. Though sheetal answer seems more logical..gramatically we will write explanation here as "that he had been involved in the cruel murder of his wife."|
|Vijay said: (Aug 31, 2014)|
|If hand in should be used means, it should be followed by 'with'.
That he had hand in with the cruel murder of his wife.
|Shayanta said: (Sep 10, 2015)|
|No way the answer is correct. The word stoutly stands wrong. Answer "A".
Stout means a short fatty person.
|Sooraj said: (Mar 5, 2017)|
|It can be "he was involved".|
|Maheer said: (Apr 4, 2017)|
|It's had been involved.|
|Nikita said: (Oct 26, 2017)|
|Stoutly persisted? It's wrong!|
|Abhi said: (Jan 16, 2018)|
|I guess, Either it should be, "he had a hand. " or "he was involved. ".|
|Sowjanya said: (Sep 10, 2018)|
|I agree @Abhi.|
Post your comments here:
Email : (optional)
» Your comments will be displayed only after manual approval.