IndiaBIX

Verbal Ability - Spotting Errors - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Spotting Errors - Section 1 (Q.No. 17)
Spotting Errors
Directions to Solve

Read each sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical error in it. The error, if any will be in one part of the sentence. The letter of that part is the answer. If there is no error, the answer is 'D'. (Ignore the errors of punctuation, if any).

17.

(solve as per the direction given above)

They have been
very close friends
until they quarrelled.
No error.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
'They had been'
Discussion:
50 comments Page 4 of 5.
Shantanu said:   9 years ago
You are right @Sushant, "were sounds" better here.
Rakesh said:   9 years ago
"They were very close friends until they quarrelled".

This is correct because given sentence can neither be present perfect continuous nor past because in the perfect continuous verb is always in its first form +ing.
Ram said:   9 years ago
In the above statement " quarrelled " is representing past tense. That's why our statement also represents past tense only. Replacing "have been " to " had been".

Thank you.
Manchalaakhilesh said:   9 years ago
Why can't we use quarrel instead of quarrel led.
Nidhi said:   9 years ago
Is this correct?

They were very close friends until they quarrelled.
Sahil anand said:   8 years ago
The both seems to be correct, but since the action "quarrelled" happened in the past so it's better to use past perfect.
Vatsal said:   8 years ago
What is difference between had and had been? Can anyone explain it to me?
Vimal K said:   8 years ago
I agree that ' had been ' should be used as there is ' quarreled ' but why can't we change ' quarreled' to 'quarrel'.
Rohit said:   7 years ago
Cant it be were good friends?
Gargi said:   7 years ago
Can't we write as they were very close friends?
Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.

Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers