Verbal Ability - Spotting Errors - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Spotting Errors - Section 1 (Q.No. 25)
Directions to Solve

Read each sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical error in it. The error, if any will be in one part of the sentence. The letter of that part is the answer. If there is no error, the answer is 'D'. (Ignore the errors of punctuation, if any).


25.

(solve as per the direction given above)

Mr.Praful Patel
is not attending his office
for the last month.
No error.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Mr. Praful Patel has not been attending his office for the last month.
Discussion:
46 comments Page 5 of 5.

Neelam Thakur said:   5 years ago
I think in past perfect tense we use 3rd form of verb so in place of attending. I put attended.

Correct me if I am wrong.
(1)

Aash Jain said:   4 years ago
C can also be an option as Mr Praful is not attending his office [since the last one month].
(5)

Rithwik Sonu said:   4 years ago
I think C is also the answer.
(2)

Rithwik Sonu said:   4 years ago
I think C is also the answer.
(4)

Jisan Chowdhury said:   4 years ago
Remember, for is used with a period of time.

Since is used to refer to a specific point in time.

You can use "for" and "since" with similar verb tenses.

I have been walking for five hours.
I have been walking since 10 p.m.

We have lived here for 20 years.
We have lived here since 1985.

In the example sentences, both for and since show an event that began in the past and continues into the present.
(8)

Raghunandan Nair said:   2 years ago
I think this sentence should be "Mr. Praful Patel has not been attending office for the past one month".
Or
"Mr. Praful Patel has not been attending office since last month."
(21)


Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.