Verbal Ability - Comprehension - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Comprehension - Section 4 (Q.No. 4)
Directions to Solve
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of acts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly started.
4.
The author is not happy with word 'law' because
Discussion:
21 comments Page 2 of 3.
Ankush said:
8 years ago
I think the answer shuld be C.
Anushka said:
8 years ago
A is surely a wrong answer. The answer should be B--a law implies a law giver-- and it does not hold true for nature.
Kitty said:
9 years ago
Thank you all for explaining the question.
Santhosh.r said:
10 years ago
How that the answer is A? Please explain me?
Harshal said:
1 decade ago
As per the author, Because of law nature can't make uniformity in all. If some one right about his opinion but it is against the law of nature is punished. So this perfectly explain the theme rigidity and harshness.
Chirag said:
1 decade ago
I think A is the correct answer because, the author states that the laws of nature are NOT commands,command is too harsh a word.
Yes we call them "Laws", but still they are just statements of acts done by nature itself.
Yes we call them "Laws", but still they are just statements of acts done by nature itself.
Bitanmallik said:
1 decade ago
The Answer Should be C.
It Clearly reflects from the passage that the author is not much convinced with the word 'law' rather he has asked the readers to judge the sense of uniformity should be the underlying meaning on the back of the fallacy he mentioned underscoring 'law should be given by a lawgiver'.
It Clearly reflects from the passage that the author is not much convinced with the word 'law' rather he has asked the readers to judge the sense of uniformity should be the underlying meaning on the back of the fallacy he mentioned underscoring 'law should be given by a lawgiver'.
(1)
Devi said:
1 decade ago
Here mentioned: If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature it is punished-so it seems rigidity and harshness, I think A is the answer.
Arun gupta said:
1 decade ago
The answer should be C as. " it do away with the elemantry fallacy of uniformities of nature.
Trisha Banerjee said:
1 decade ago
The ans should be C. As somtimes law makes the judgement bias for one party, means it is not uniform in all cases.
But for nature's law it comes with eqiuty to every dwellers of it.
But for nature's law it comes with eqiuty to every dwellers of it.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers