Logical Reasoning - Statement and Argument - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Statement and Argument - Section 3 (Q.No. 29)
Directions to Solve
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
29.
Statement: Should mercy death be legalized, i.e., all those who are suffering from terminal diseases be allowed to end their lives if they so desire?
Arguments:
- No. Nobody should be allowed to end his/her life at his/her will as this goes against the basic tenets of humanity.
- Yes. Patients undergoing terrible suffering and having absolutely no chance of recovery should be liberated from suffering through mercy death.
- No. Even mercy death is a sort of killing and killing can never be legalized.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Clearly, mercy death will serve as a liberation to those to whom living is more difficult and painful. But then, it is an inhuman act and does not appeal. So, both arguments II and III hold strong. Besides, it becomes our moral duty to encourage such people to live their lives to the fullest and support them through the crisis/and not demoralize them by allowing them to die if they wish to. Hence, argument I also holds strong.
Discussion:
2 comments Page 1 of 1.
Aravind raj said:
1 decade ago
In 3rd point of argument, it says that killing can never be legalized but we know that Killing is legalized in our law i.e., punishment of death is already in practice. According to this, argument 3 is weak. So answer is only I & II are strong.
Manish said:
1 decade ago
Third option should not be correct because it is said that it can never be legalized.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers