Logical Reasoning - Statement and Argument - Discussion
Discussion Forum : Statement and Argument - Section 2 (Q.No. 11)
Directions to Solve
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer:
- (A) If only argument I is strong
- (B) If only argument II is strong
- (C) If either I or II is strong
- (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
- (E) If both I and II are strong.
11.
Statement: Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?
Arguments:
- No. Such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country.
- Yes. It is democracy - let people decide whom to vote.
Answer: Option
Explanation:
Clearly, persons with criminal background cannot stand to serve as the representatives of the common people. So, they should not be allowed to contest elections. Thus, only argument I holds, while II does not.
Discussion:
13 comments Page 2 of 2.
Ranjit said:
7 years ago
If the person is criminal and if he changed then he has a right to contest and moreover its a democratic rule.
My answer is B.
My answer is B.
(1)
Saddam said:
7 years ago
Option B should be right.
MONEY SUGAR said:
5 years ago
I agree on @Ali,
If it's democracy then let the people decide.
Democracy is popularly defined as the government of the people, by the people and for the people. So, I think argument II is also strong.
If it's democracy then let the people decide.
Democracy is popularly defined as the government of the people, by the people and for the people. So, I think argument II is also strong.
Post your comments here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers