# Logical Reasoning - Logical Problems - Discussion

Discussion Forum : Logical Problems - Type 1 (Q.No. 3)
Directions to Solve
Each problem consists of three statements. Based on the first two statements, the third statement may be true, false, or uncertain.

3.
All the trees in the park are flowering trees.
Some of the trees in the park are dogwoods.
All dogwoods in the park are flowering trees.
If the first two statements are true, the third statement is
true
false
uncertain
Answer: Option
Explanation:
All of the trees in the park are flowering trees, So all dogwoods in the park are flowering trees.
Discussion:
42 comments Page 1 of 5.

Sundar said:   1 decade ago
All the trees in the park are flowering trees.

So, a flowering tree should satisfy two conditions.

1. It should be a Tree (Some of the trees in the park are dogwoods).
2. It should be in the Park (Some of the trees in the park are dogwoods).

Since, dogwoods satisfy the above conditions, "All dogwoods in the park are flowering trees" - True.

Note: If the dogwoods outside the park, it may or may-not be flowering trees.

Kyla said:   1 decade ago
If you use the venn diagram, the result is invalid. Also, when you follow the three rules of syllogism you will see that the conclusion is invalid. If we look at the conclusion, the subject (Dogwoods) is not distributed in any of the premises which violates rule #3 of the rules of syllogism.

Vrinda said:   1 year ago
Yeah! The answer should be false as it is mentioned in the second statement that some trees in the park are dogwood.

And according to my knowledge, we are not supposed to apply our prior knowledge even if dogwood trees are flowering trees.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
(5)

Asif Amin said:   1 decade ago
This question is totally based on 1st Sentence that.

All the trees in the park are flowering trees.

And the 2nd sentence is Dogwoods which also in the park I mean it is also counted in the All trees in the park I think you got my point.

Moses xhao sondash said:   1 decade ago
The 3rd premise doesn't logically follow from the first two premises, in syllogism, if one of the premises is universal (with a quantifier All) and the other is particular (Some) the conclusion should be particular hence wrongly deducted.

Aurobindo said:   1 decade ago
If we use the venn diagram the result is invalid. And also according to rules of syllogism the conclusion is invalid because in syllogism, if one of the premises of a statement is particular the conclusion should be particular.

Shradha said:   1 decade ago
1. all the trees in park is flowering tree
so dogwoods is one kind of tree which is planted in the park
you can say like a classification of tree
so, any kind of tree planted in park is flowering tree

Mayur said:   8 years ago
Listen friend all you people told its very, simple. I agree with all but nobody is explained with tricks. How to solve such type of complex problem. If you have any ideas, tricks. Then please tell me.

Shambhavi Rai said:   1 year ago
Here is written that all the trees in the plant contain flowers right?

Here it is written all so every plant contains a flower so the dogwood tree also contains flowers.

Correct me if I am wrong.

Vinod said:   8 years ago
The correct answer is false. Because some of the trees in park are dogwood not all. So when we do it using venn diagram it will be wrong. So the correct answer is FALSE.

Post your comments here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.