Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?

It costs money and time both, but will give right leader, they will bring good change and development in future.

Hello friends,

I feel that Nota should not be provided for voters. It has been 2 years since the nota have been provided and only 2 % of the votes go for Nota. So it eventually has no impact and incases Nota wins.

There will be re-election which will only waste time and money.

No, voters should not be given NOTA choice, because if everyone go for this choice in votings, then definitely no political party will come in the country. And there will be 99% chance of coming military raj in the country. Also the money wasted on the elections will be of no use. This was started for the benefit of people but I think that this may also go against the benefit of public.

If NOTA is made available than it will create unnecessary chaos. Conducting an election needs huge amount of money and if re-elections are done than huge amount of public money is wasted with time. So I would suggest that vote for the right person who will bring the change.

Yes, NOTA option should be available as we are democratic public and have all rights to cast out opinion, if NOTA candidate got maximum votes it means simply election commission and parties should choose candidates again who are potential and philanthropists as most of the time candidates get ticket on behalf of offering huge amount of money to parties, it will cater corruption and malpractices especially who has criminal records and want to wash off hands through politics.

Again and re-election might create time gap and delay in administration so it should allow either twice or thrice.

This option will put pressure for parties if they won't work better then nobody will go for them.

Major of public 20-30% don't cast vote every year cause political leaders are actually not shaping Indian growth in the right way and we lost.

Partially our trust in bureaucracy so this step will be more effective.

We live in a democratic country everyone has their own choice. If someone thinks that none of is capable of being any post for that NOTA is must be there.

According to me, the NOTA option should be given to the voters and also treated like a candidate in the election. If the NOTA option wins the election then the Election Commission should take necessary steps against the candidates who were standing in the election from that seat. It will not only improve the transparency in the elections but also ensure that the most deserving, dedicated and popular candidates contest the election.

No need of that in fact if someone doesn't want to give a vote for candidates why should he go for voting.

Yes, I think voters should be a given a choice as NOTA at the time of elections. Most of the candidates who stand for votes in an election are corrupt, disqualified that's why our country is behind countries like Japan, china etc. If people think none of the candidates is suitable to give votes, then NOTA will be their choice. If votes on NOTA is more than 75%, then the government would be forced to take necessary steps against the candidate who stands up for elections. Most of the candidates who are puppets of some political parties would then fear to stand for elections.

For a developing country like India, it is vital that a candidate should be qualified and have the potential to make our country free of corruption, poor, illiteracy etc.

With Nota, people will not do anything about politicians. Because if they use Nota I mean they not like any candidate. There is no effect on any party.