Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
184 comments Page 17 of 19.
Jatin said:
2 years ago
I think there should not be (NOTA) option in election. Because there is need of atleast one party to be in power to regulate the economy if there will be such option it will reduce the vote percentage.
(2)
Hdubey said:
7 years ago
According to me, Nota is make for that people who have no option to choose best candidate in their place but it's drawback also that in India corrupt candidates win election because people use Nota.
(14)
Rahul Agarwal said:
9 years ago
Yes, friend's I agree with NOTA option, if you think candidate are not eligible for your vote then you must vote for nota. So educated candidate selected and your country becomes developed.
(2)
Vikhil karthi said:
7 years ago
Hi everyone,
In my point of view, NOTA option is very good because if we get 35% of NOTA votes then both the candidates are not eligible for the election and candidates must be changed.
In my point of view, NOTA option is very good because if we get 35% of NOTA votes then both the candidates are not eligible for the election and candidates must be changed.
(9)
Abhishek gupta 4244 said:
8 years ago
Yes, I agree.
NOTA is just a way so that people can have a choice to express their Bad opinions if any of all the candidates of all d parties and Select the best one for their region.
NOTA is just a way so that people can have a choice to express their Bad opinions if any of all the candidates of all d parties and Select the best one for their region.
(6)
Hema said:
7 years ago
Hello friends.
In my point, I say that nota is just for wasting our time. Because many give money to people and they get money, for getting the money we can put a vote in nota.
In my point, I say that nota is just for wasting our time. Because many give money to people and they get money, for getting the money we can put a vote in nota.
(13)
RAJESH said:
9 years ago
The presence of NOTA is mandatory nowadays because of democratic rule there is possible chance for the people to support/nonsupport. Definitely it is required NOTA in the list.
(8)
Rajesh Kumar said:
2 years ago
In my point, I think there should be nota option because we know that there candidates are not fit for the role, if any person is not interested then he can choose this option.
(10)
Devang talaviya said:
8 years ago
Yes, I think it gives to people. Because when leaders are not good then people have to choose to give the vote in NOTA. It also uses full for knowing the image of leaders.
(9)
Mahima tripathi said:
2 years ago
I think the NoTa option should be given because it helps the people to be involved in the election and have the right to not select anyone. It's totally their opinion.
(6)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers