Should voters be given a NOTA (None Of The Above) choice?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
184 comments Page 17 of 19.
Sukriti said:
1 year ago
Voters should have a NOTA (None of the Above) option.
This empowers citizens to express dissatisfaction with all candidates, pushing political parties to improve their offerings. It’s a vital tool for true democratic expression, ensuring that voter choices are genuinely representative.
This empowers citizens to express dissatisfaction with all candidates, pushing political parties to improve their offerings. It’s a vital tool for true democratic expression, ensuring that voter choices are genuinely representative.
(3)
Siddharth kheroniya said:
1 year ago
Yes,
NOTA option signifies that it is to compulsory that all the candidates nominated for an election are appropriate for that constituency. This gives the right to voters to nominate tha candidates again. This option is enough to show the dissatisfaction of the voters.
NOTA option signifies that it is to compulsory that all the candidates nominated for an election are appropriate for that constituency. This gives the right to voters to nominate tha candidates again. This option is enough to show the dissatisfaction of the voters.
(3)
Kikk said:
9 years ago
Those are unaware about politician's politics they should not have right to vote because they are only increasing votes of one leader. Those know all own area's politician members work they will vote them if they are appreciating them and those would like no one from selected members to give rights of developing area or to complete necessities of people then they will select NOTA. So many people are against politics so they will go for voting and will press NOTA.
(2)
Yash said:
9 years ago
If NOTA will be applied and then NOTA wins the election and then they start re-election then In the re-election they should choose by checking people's qualifications & the backgrounds to vote. So that the election will be successful. If they don't want to reelect the third time.
(2)
Karan said:
9 years ago
NOTA will be completely a wrong choice provided to the voters.
If people started using such options then the members will be elected by their party members only. Such elected member will be not agreed by the locality there.
If people started using such options then the members will be elected by their party members only. Such elected member will be not agreed by the locality there.
(2)
Sooraj Singh said:
9 years ago
Hello.
Dear, friends.
First of all, we need to know why we should be given NOTA.
Because India is a democratic country we should have to respect their voting right. Freedom of expression.
But there is a problem because it does not give the right to the NOTA voters so it seems to be useless if we give power to them then it will be effective.
Thus, we can choose a better candidate for re-election as the leader will have to give a good option.
Dear, friends.
First of all, we need to know why we should be given NOTA.
Because India is a democratic country we should have to respect their voting right. Freedom of expression.
But there is a problem because it does not give the right to the NOTA voters so it seems to be useless if we give power to them then it will be effective.
Thus, we can choose a better candidate for re-election as the leader will have to give a good option.
(2)
Raju said:
9 years ago
Hello.
I think that the NOTA option is good for us because in many places of India where the candidates use power and money to get the vote. In this situation, the voters can easily use NOTA option for an undesirable candidate.
I think that the NOTA option is good for us because in many places of India where the candidates use power and money to get the vote. In this situation, the voters can easily use NOTA option for an undesirable candidate.
(2)
EPSHITA said:
9 years ago
In my opinion, NOTA option is not a perfect solution to prevent undesirable candidates from taking charge. But as in present, it is the only option available so we can present it before people in a better way. People should be made aware about its result (re-elections) which is a " BIG NO" so that people choose NOTA option when the candidates are really undeserving.
In such case re-elections are conducted, which will consume lesser resource than a rejected candidate will waste during its ruling span.
In such case re-elections are conducted, which will consume lesser resource than a rejected candidate will waste during its ruling span.
(2)
Alina said:
9 years ago
Democracy is from/of/for the people. But every given candidate may not be suitable for power. So NOTA option is best for this situation. If the NOTA % increases. A test should be conducted to choose a new candidate, by this, we will assure that the candidate is well educated and is worth for the post.
(2)
Rahul Agarwal said:
9 years ago
Yes, friend's I agree with NOTA option, if you think candidate are not eligible for your vote then you must vote for nota. So educated candidate selected and your country becomes developed.
(2)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers