Should Smoking be Banned Completely?
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
- Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
- Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
- Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
- Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
170 comments Page 8 of 17.
Keerthi said:
9 years ago
I think it should be left to individual to decide. Even after knowing it's ill effects they are willing to smoke and die who are we to stop them. Everyone has right to decide.
(5)
Ravindra Patil said:
9 years ago
Smoking should not be banned, it should be regulated by bringing new laws it will helps to stop illegal and the cancerous smoking product comes into the market, direct banning it does solve the problem. Banning leads loss of revenue and most of the people's loss their job. We have a freedom to eat, speak and smoke but smoking should not allow in public places like garden, streets, schools and colleges. The new laws increase awareness among people through advertisement, TV, and labeling on products.
(13)
Pintu said:
9 years ago
Smoking should be banned completely but by not suddenly making a law because addicted person can't face it so, it is very necessary to make a law and banned completely but the law should come in action by advertising before 1or 2 years the law action.
(14)
VISHAL said:
9 years ago
Hi, every one.
I will agree with some of them.
Nowadays the person who is addicted to smoke is involving his/her friends to smoke which is very bad to himself and to the others.
As we are talking about smoking it should be banned because it is easy to smoke but very difficult to leave it or stop it. So government should take preventive measures to reduce it.
Thank you.
I will agree with some of them.
Nowadays the person who is addicted to smoke is involving his/her friends to smoke which is very bad to himself and to the others.
As we are talking about smoking it should be banned because it is easy to smoke but very difficult to leave it or stop it. So government should take preventive measures to reduce it.
Thank you.
(16)
Pearl said:
9 years ago
Smoking should be banned because it doesn't harm only the person smoke's but also harms the people around, it deteriorates the health of the smoker and its surrounding by polluting the environment.
(31)
Sakthi said:
9 years ago
Smoking is full and full not banned because the youth like the smoking habit. But smoking is injurious our health and create the pollution. The smoking is create a cancer.
(6)
Ravi prakash pandey said:
9 years ago
Yes, I am with totally banned smoking. First by smoking pollution increase and second it is harmful to youth's stamina as for others as well. I saw that many students can't study because of addiction of smoking. Initially, they start taking smoking but after some days smoking takes them and kill their stamina.
(13)
Anushka m said:
9 years ago
Smoking should be banned because it is very injurious to health it also hurts our heart. If you smoke it will cause pollution. If possible please do not smoke in public places. So smoking should be banned completely.
(13)
Jemish.k shah said:
9 years ago
Yes, it should be banned in India and stop production it causes death of a person and health related issues so it should be completely banned.
(13)
Susheel bhardwaj said:
9 years ago
According to me, smoking ban is not the right way to go, the right way to go is to spread awareness among youth by conducting debates and seminars on the topic. If you will ban smoking youth will resort to cocaine and heroin consumption some or the other way which is very hard to be addict. Due to smoking ban, many will lose their jobs and strikes will be conducted all over the country leading to chaos.
(18)
Post your thoughts here:
Quick links
Quantitative Aptitude
Verbal (English)
Reasoning
Programming
Interview
Placement Papers