Should Smoking be Banned Completely?

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
170 comments Page 14 of 17.

Mohd shehazad said:   4 years ago
Hi everyone. I'm Shehazad.

According to me, it should be completed banned smoking in India. Because smoking kills a human and animals within a short period of time or infected some health problems long time and parents took a secret smoke inside the house children infected also.
(29)

Giovanni from Italy said:   10 years ago
Alcohol causes cancer.

Red meats causes cancer.

Car emissions causes cancer.

Obesity causes cancer.

Some medications causes cancer.

Let's ban even these things?

Oh, and banning things really solves the problem, look at the prohibition in the 20's and the drug wars.
(26)

Siri said:   9 years ago
In my point of view, I totally agree with smoking be banned completely but not sudden, slowly do this process because if any case government will ban the smoking suddenly some chances of addicted to drugs. Drugs are so dangerous than cigarette so band the smoking slowly.
(45)

Latesh Shownkeen said:   10 years ago
No. They will be stable enough. They would learn slowly to live without cigarettes. They will be troubled for some days but finally they will be alright and would get rid of their smoking habits. Their health should enrich and they will be come better humans.
(24)

Yogita markad said:   8 years ago
I completely agree to banned smoking but it should not be banned completely. Because many people gets unemployment it affects on that people as well as government generate huge revenue from this sector. If suddenly smoking is ban this impacting on economy.
(12)

Tamil puthalvan said:   10 years ago
Hi this is Tamil.

I agree with the points. You all are saying about banning cigarettes. But only by banning of cigarettes can't help people those who all are smoking Then they move to other bad habits so spreading awareness, counseling them.

Thank you.
(15)

Pooja said:   8 years ago
According to my opinion, smoking shouldn't be completely banned because more than half of the earning from it, in the way of tax and other side effects our health and culture also. We should take steps to remove it then the only problem will be solved.
(10)

Pintu said:   9 years ago
Smoking should be banned completely but by not suddenly making a law because addicted person can't face it so, it is very necessary to make a law and banned completely but the law should come in action by advertising before 1or 2 years the law action.
(14)

Gourab Sen said:   4 years ago
Yes, smoking requires to be banned in India on obvious and strict note, as it directly affects smoker's lungs and passively hampers lungs of a non smokers.

Already, there are lot of reasons for air pollutions, don't need more to affect lungs further.
(16)

Mak man said:   8 years ago
Yes, it should be banned, and there must not be any issues of violation of rights of freedom of an individual since constitution provides rights of freedom keeping in view that the freedom should not harm other's freedom or proves deadly to them.
(37)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.