Should important services like transport be left to market forces?.

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
15 comments Page 2 of 2.

Sanjay Akhouri said:   1 decade ago
When country is already plagued with capital shortage, it would always be prudent to open certain sector of public utilities for better service even if it costs more. Such services can be segregated in different 2-3 economic zones depending upon the paying capacity of the commuters so that no economic class is deprived of the facility though the comfort level will depend upon the penny in the pocket.
(8)

Rajendra said:   9 years ago
In a country is already plagued with the capital shortage, it would always be prudent to open certain sector of public utilities for better service even if it costs more. Such services can be segregated in different 2-3 economic zones depending upon the paying capacity of the consumer so that no economic class is deprived of the facility though the comfort level will depend on the penny in the pocket.
(9)

Uttara said:   8 years ago
In India, transport sector mainly railways run by government Heavy subsidy is given on rail tickets. Half of the population in India depend on railways for a mass movement and they depend on subsidised tickets. Regional trains are the most convenient way of transport. And lakhs of passengers travel via these trains every day. So this is govt's public service agenda to transport the citizen in a lower rate of tickets. If this sector is run by market forces then rates of tickets will score drastically and layman won't be able to move frequently for their necessary work. Some will argue that railway reform should be there. It is true that the condition of Indian trains is very dismal. They are not well maintained some are unhygienic but people need to understand the huge cost of maintenance of this sector. It is tax payer's money which govt disburses during budget so if govt allows more fund to this sector there will be a shortage in other sectors. If a private sector is allowed to run transport then trains will be maintained well but the pricing will go out of pocket as happened in plane fares. So govt should not leave important services like transport to market forces but to some extent, it should entertain model to increase the efficiency of the existing employees to maintain proper hygiene in railways and allied sector.
(13)

Vinay said:   8 years ago
In a country is already plagued with the capital shortage, it would always be prudent to open certain sector of public utilities for better service even if it costs more.
(2)

Inam said:   7 years ago
In my views, I think it can be left in the hand of market forces because if we see the present condition of roads & infrastructure of maximum places we find they damaged sewage water coming out of sewage tanks & I think the same is the condition of railways waste is not properly disposed waste is thrown aside track itself many trains are in bad conditions which leads to delay etc. By looking to the current scenario we can think of it but authority needs to keep a check on market forces too or else condition remains the same. Thank You.
(24)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.