Should Agricultural Subsidies be stopped?

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
126 comments Page 7 of 13.

Tappu said:   1 decade ago
Hello friends,

India is a agricultural based country. Agriculture supplies 16.6% of our GDP and 50% of our work force. But we have to accept that in India farmers are the poorest peoples in our country. So, subsidy is needed. But with subsidy our govt should take some more steps as well. The steps are,

1. Govt should educate our farmers.

2. Subsidies should be monitored properly so that all can enjoy those subsidy, not only the rich peoples.

3. In some part of our country the subsidized goods are sold at lower price to neighboring countries. Our govt should take proper steps to control those things.
(31)

Rahul said:   1 decade ago
Subsidy of agriculture should not be stopped. Our farmer still having technological, pricing problems. Most importantly today most of the green lands are converted into residential colonies, eczs, so some of the remaining farmers need subsidies.
(5)

Anirudh said:   1 decade ago
No matter how great our country is in the agricultural field, still the people of our country perish and even die of hunger. For providing poor people with basic necessity such as food, government has introduced "SUBSIDY". But these subsidies are not beneficial for the long run.

In fact, former UN secretary general Kofi Annan warned India against populist subsidies as it would be difficult to end such relief once granted. The government should review it's policies instead of providing subsidies.

India exports bulks of agricultural goods but instead, if these goods are sold out to the public, the prices (inflation) would be under control and nobody will have to sleep with an empty stomach. For some, subsidies is a dire need (although it should be temporary) but for some, it is a way to save some bucks. One should not create a situation where people do not value it.

The best choice would be to first reform the policies, grant people food at an affordable and bearable price and then stop the subsidy. Hope the government is listening!
(16)

Rajeev said:   1 decade ago
Our nation India is an agricultural country. More then 70% of the population in India is dependent on Agricultural activity. Agricultural sector contributes to around 50% of our exports. Tea, Tobacco, Paper, Spices, Flowers, Oil seeds, Fruits, Vegetables etc are the major agricultural products exported from our country. Many industries like, Tractors, Fertilizer, Pesticide, Agricultural implements etc are supplying their products to agricultural sector. It also provides employment in various other sectors like transport etc. Many industries are depended on agriculture for their raw materials. Eg. Cotton, Sugar, Tobacco, Paper etc.

During 1950's more than 50% of the national income was contributed by agriculture. But the contribution of agriculture is gradually diminishing and now it has come down to almost 13%. Now-a-days, the traditional farmers have a tendency to switch over from agricultural activity. In view of the above, we need to promote agricultural sector and the same is possible only through subsiding the inputs for agriculture like fertilizer, pesticides, implements, equipment's etc. Any move for stopping subsidy in agricultural sector would be suicidal.
(60)

Bachi said:   1 decade ago
Hello everyone as per my opinion subsidy to farmers should not be stopped, why because 70% of Indians are depends upon the agriculture and also they are backbone to our nation economy they are scarifying their entire life to feed the world, now a days food which we are taking totally artificial with that human life also coming down now the people how depends on agriculture are decreasing day by day because of they are not getting good returns on their crops, they don't have any awareness on technology the government should give the training to the farmers for better working and should encourage to minimize the artificial fertilizers. The government should encourage the students to study the agriculture education.
(8)

Samar Hussain said:   1 decade ago
Farm subsidy is essential for the development of rural India. Indian economy is dependent on agriculture for employment which also employs a lot of population both directly and indirectly.

Subsidies are direct instruments to give impetus to agricultural growth. The subsidies on power and seeds also lead to their misuse and loss to the nation. The government should rather create market for agriculture products, raise minimum support price, give cheap credits to farmers, revamp land laws and work for transfer of technology from lab to the fields. Subsidies will not kill the root problem that farmers are facing but will make them excessively dependent upon Government to rescue them in bad times. The Government Should create forward linkage for the farmers and food processing industries should boost the marketing of agri products.

Again the subsidies do not reach the ultimate land worker. The landlords who usually remain absent from farm and are not directly engaged in farmers or not at all concerned take away the benefits of the subsidy. The poor farmers remains deprived.

Subsidies are a burden to the national Finance as these are not investment. The subsidies on agriculture should be abolished in a phase manner. Also marginal farmers in tribal belt and North east should have alternate arrangements for subsidies and in time the subsidy should be replaced by cheap loans or insurance.
(41)

Ritu Raj said:   1 decade ago
Hi.

In my view subsidy in agriculture should not be stopped instead the process of reaching the subsidy to the farmers to be made foolproof by linking it to direct credit in banks account. If government stop paying subsidy to farmers who are almost 75% of our population and contributing to only 25% of GDP they will not be able to survive on agriculture as they are dependent for their products not only on market but also on good whether and sometimes they loss their produces for the bad whether. So for the survival of poor agriculturist and to feed the large population of India it is necessary to support the agri sector.

Bye.
(18)

Satya said:   1 decade ago
I'm my opinion providing subsidies to farmers is a trick used by politicians to attract farmers to get maximum votes in elections. Because the subsidies provided by the government does not reach the farmers.
(21)

Leaf said:   1 decade ago
Agricultural subsidies are necessary.

1. Agriculture is the basis of our economy. It provides food for our survival.

2. Without subsidies, the force competition would allow no profit in agriculture. Agriculture is highly influenced by the weather so the price would fluctuate naturally. When the price is low, it would be impossible for farmers to earn a living.

Each coin has two sides. Agricultural subsidies are a little bit unfair for people in other fields, but from a broader aspect, they are still necessary.
(17)

Manish said:   1 decade ago
No, as per the situation in India whatever subsidies provided by the govt to the public is not transparent, first govt should insure that subsidies should directly go to the farmer a/c. In India beneficiaries are not getting the benefit which would they have to get. Agriculture is most important sector in India but because of not proper support from the govt agriculture sector contribution is decreasing day-by-day, whatever subsidies is provided by the govt is going the waste and govt saying that we have provide so much of benefit to the farmer.
(8)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.